+1
The buildout approach was exactly what I was thinking when reading
Nate's last email too, Steve :)
Niche/Type-of-Site/Industry-specific Distros are something we've talked
about for a long time. I recall a few of us on this list doing so at a
BoF at the Seattle Conference.
But we didn't
Plone 4: The 'Stealthy Bliss Release' ?
I see it being akin to the updated Facebook iPhone App that finally
respects ones 'block' settings, so one doesn't have to read through
everyone's Farmville and Mafia updates ;)
Sometimes it's the little things that really matter to people. Apple is
. ;)
Eric
On Apr 14, 2010, at 11:40 AM, Ken Wasetis [Contextual Corp.] wrote:
Plone 4: The 'Stealthy Bliss Release' ?
I see it being akin to the updated Facebook iPhone App that finally respects
ones 'block' settings, so one doesn't have to read through everyone's Farmville
and Mafia updates
when Microsoft starts touting
TCO numbers. ;)
--
Alexander Limi · http://limi.net http://limi.net/
On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 8:27 PM, Ken Wasetis [Contextual Corp.]
ken.wase...@contextualcorp.com
mailto:ken.wase...@contextualcorp.com wrote:
Virginia,
I had mentioned this Sharepoint cost
Matt,
It would be great to get a list of the things Plone would need to do to
be considered categorized as Enterprise by CMS Watch.
If I were to venture a guess, it might be:
1) Gartner and/or Forrester have a good rating on this CMS
2) Have a large vendor behind the product that provides a
Nate,
This is great to see we're headed in the right direction, but I think
the fact I am saying that, says we're not there yet and is why Plone
isn't looked at as 'Enterprise' just yet.
Nice job on the post, Sally. Actually, I had seen it recently, but
couldn't recall who/where it was
How about 'Military Grade Security'?
It has possibly negative military connotations, but I don't think most
CMS reviewers will read too much into that. Regardless of ones
politics, I think the fact that Zope is on the published approved OSS
list of packages at DoD, and Plone specifically is
Wasetis [Contextual Corp.] wrote:
Thanks for the valuable write-up. Following up on Matt's point, why
couldn't the 'Plone Foundation' be the organization/vendor rated by
the analysts? Let them analyze the staying power of the Foundation,
the project, the CMS - that has to be a strength of Plone
Steve,
Thanks for the valuable write-up. Following up on Matt's point, why
couldn't the 'Plone Foundation' be the organization/vendor rated by the
analysts? Let them analyze the staying power of the Foundation, the
project, the CMS - that has to be a strength of Plone that we're not
Hi Scott,
I wanted to make sure we linked up at Gilbane; maybe we can discuss in
more depth some pros/cons of Plone versus other systems and you can
determine the best way to position that in the panel discussion without
it being so us-versus-them. We have a small pedestal display area for
Scott,
Regarding the different approaches, I think it's worth mentioning and
possibly getting some input/material from Chris Johnson at ifPeople on
the concept of 'Social Sourcing'. He's made some presentations at Plone
conferences on the topic and this is how the PloneGetPaid.com
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 8:51 PM, Ken Wasetis [Contextual Corp.]
ken.wase...@contextualcorp.com
mailto:ken.wase...@contextualcorp.com wrote:
Nate,
Personally, I think these t-shirts would work well as prizes, but
seem a bit weak as a marketing message for Plone, when
standing/sitting
12 matches
Mail list logo
