Re: [Evergreen-general] [External] Discussion/Heat request for Bug 1721053

2024-07-29 Thread Elizabeth Davis via Evergreen-general
Hi Ben I think this makes sense. Using the structure already in place for Circulation policies and Circulation limit sets would keep it consistent. [cid:image004.png@01DAE192.26487AD0]Elizabeth Davis (she/her), Support & Project Management Specialist Pennsylvania Integrated Library System (P

Re: [Evergreen-general] [External] Discussion/Heat request for Bug 1721053

2024-07-26 Thread Ruth Frasur via Evergreen-general
Benjamin, I'm capturing your comments (with a little scrubbing) to add to the LP ticket. On Fri, Jul 26, 2024 at 10:58 AM Murphy, Benjamin via Evergreen-general < evergreen-general@list.evergreen-ils.org> wrote: > This is something that we also run into regularly and is an annoyance for > staff.

Re: [Evergreen-general] [External] Discussion/Heat request for Bug 1721053

2024-07-26 Thread Murphy, Benjamin via Evergreen-general
This is something that we also run into regularly and is an annoyance for staff. I think the ideal behavior for us would be: If there's a limit on a circmod, a patron hits the max holds on that circmod and can't place more holds for that circmod, but they're not restricted in the number of hold