Jacques Mallah wrote:
>
> --- Russell Standish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > There needs to be psychological time in which to
> > unravel the history embedded in a single observer
> > moment. Once one has psychological time, one may as
> > well go the whole hog and have a complete history,
> > w
--- Russell Standish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jacques Mallah wrote:
> > Are you saying that the Sh. eq. gives a
> > measure distribution for "outcomes" of
> > "observables" even when there are no observer-
> > moments? What is that supposed to mean?
> The SE is well defined given our state o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On Wed, 3 May 2000, Higgo James wrote:
> 'Psychological time' is a concept of time, part of your current psychology.
> Occam would disapprove of assuming that psychological events are real
> events; assuming a hard, physical world when there is no need for one.
3 matches
Mail list logo
