George Levy wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Example: a never ending universe history h is computed by a finite
nonhalting program p. To simulate randomness and noise etc, p invokes a
short pseudorandom generator subroutine q which also never halts. The
n-th pseudorandom event of
Robert W. wrote:
I also mention it because it seems that much of the
dicussion here is forcing understanding through
symbolic logic.
There is no way to force understanding.
You know there was a time when people believed that the
5th postulate of Euclide geometry was a consequence of
the four
scerir wrote:
Juergen Schmidhuber wrote:
Which are the logically possible universes? Max Tegmark mentioned
a somewhat vaguely defined set of self-consistent mathematical
structures'' implying provability of some sort. The postings of Bruno
Marchal and George Levy and Hal Ruhl
Russell Standish wrote:
Ah! You mean the problem of consciousness (or more exactly, the problem
of having a theory of conscsiousness). Yes - I'm well aware of this
problem, and unlike some, I don't believe it is a non-problem.
OK. I prefer to call it the mind-body problem. That reminds us that
Juergen Schmidhuber wrote
Which are the logically possible universes? Max Tegmark mentioned
a somewhat vaguely defined set of ``self-consistent mathematical
structures,'' implying provability of some sort. The postings of Bruno
Marchal and George Levy and Hal Ruhl also focus on what's provable
5 matches
Mail list logo
