I was shocked to hear of James Higgo's passing. I still
have his replies to some of my postings. The multiverse concept is of
little comfort on occasions like these.
Fred
Saibal Mitra wrote:
> According to quantum theory there exists a finite probability that someone
> will simulate me in a virtual environment using a computer. This means
that
> there is a finite probability that I could wake up in a virtual world with
> different effective laws of physics. Of co
According to quantum theory there exists a finite probability that someone
will simulate me in a virtual environment using a computer. This means that
there is a finite probability that I could wake up in a virtual world with
different effective laws of physics. Of course, the real laws of physics
Hal Ruhl wrote
>Pole #1: Nothing? => true.
>Pole #2: Everything? => true.
My best understanding of that is
Nothing? = False ("false -> true" is a propositional tautology)
Everything? = true ("true -> true" is a propositional tautology).
You *do* have a communication problem. I'm sure that
Hi George,
I hope my last post was not to rude.
You see, now's my turn to feel guilty.
Also I was not completely honest ...
I guess I'm afraid that (re)abording the technical part
of my thesis could interfere with the writting of the paper
I told Russell about.
I'm very nervous with that writti
5 matches
Mail list logo
