Saibal writes:
> According to the conventional QTI, not only do you live forever, you can
> also never forget anything. I don't believe this because I know for a
> fact that I have forgotten quite a lot of things that have happened a
> long time ago.
Right, but to make the same argument against
According to the conventional QTI, not only do you live forever,
you can also never forget anything. I don't believe this because I know
for a fact that I have forgotten quite a lot of things that have happened a long
time ago.
Saibal
Charles Goodwin wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Saibal Mitra [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >
> > As I have written before, a person is just a computation being
implemented
> > somewhere. Suppose that the person has discovered that he suffers from a
> > terminal ilness and he dies
Jesse Mazer wrote:
>I don't really think there's some "other metaphysical realm" where we get
>dropped from, but I do think that, as an analogy, the spotlight one is not
>actually so bad. After all, if you think that you just *are* your current
>observer-moment, how can you possibly become any
Fred Chen wrote:
>Hal, Charles, I think this is an unavoidable part of the QTI or FIN debate.
>It seems that with QTI, you could only be entering white rabbit
>(magical-type) universes, not continue in probable ones.
>
>But in general I have a more fundamental objection (to quantum
> immortality)
5 matches
Mail list logo