Dear Stephen,
When you say:
[...]
We might not be able to know what it is like to be a bat
but surely we could know what it is like to be an ameoba!
It is amusing because I describe often---for exemple my thesis
or http://www.escribe.com/science/theory/m3651.html--- my whole
work as an attempt
Stephen,
Thanks for clarifying that point. I take it it was a misprint. I am new to
this list and am still trying to understand what you guys are talking about.
Forgive me if I pick on you but your interventions seem to me the most lucid
of the ones I have read thus far! I have two naive comments
On Thu, Dec 26, 2002 at 08:21:38PM -0500, Stephen Paul King wrote:
Forgive me if my writting gave you that opinion. I meant to imply that
any mind, including that of a bat, is quantum mechanical and not classical
in its nature. My ideas follow the implications of Hitoshi Kitada's theory
of
Dear Wei,
Interleaving.
- Original Message -
From: Wei Dai [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Stephen Paul King [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 27, 2002 4:18 PM
Subject: Re: Quantum Probability and Decision Theory
On Thu, Dec 26, 2002 at 08:21:38PM -0500, Stephen
See response attached as text file:
Joao Leao wrote:
Both seem to me rather vaccuous statements since we don't
really yet have a theory, classical or quantum or whathaveyou , of what a
mind is or does. I don't mean an emprirical, or verifiable, or decidable
or merely speculative theory! I mean
5 matches
Mail list logo
