On 27 Feb 2004 at 16:16, John M wrote:
> Thanks Ron, for the teaching in particular particles.
Allow me to
> interspace some naive remarks into your text John
Mine be not teachings, but only musings. Your thoughts
impress me as fully 180 to those musings and I am not so
sure that either of our mus
I deliberately leave vague what is in the theory of the mind, but
simply assume a small number of things about consciousness:
1) That there is a linear dimension called (psycholgical) time, in which the
conscious mind find itself embedded
2) The observations are a form of a projection from the se
Thanks Ron, for the teaching in
particular particles. Allow me to interspace some naive remarks into your
text
John
- Original Message -
From:
Ron
McFarland
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 27, 2004 10:39
AM
Subject: Re: Black Holes and Gravity
Car
On 26 Feb 2004 at 11:37, John M wrote:
> Ron:
> do you believe there are non-virtual gravitons?
> John Mikes
Greetings, John. Over the decades I've waffled a lot on that
very question. I currently do not believe that any type of
gravity force carrier exists, and it is an attempt to
explain the
This article from NYTimes.com
has been sent to you by [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Or the cosmological constant?:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
/ advertisement ---\
THE DREAMERS - NOW PLAYING
Set against the turbulent political backdrop of 1968 France when the
voice of yout
At 09:19 25/02/04 +1100, Russell Standish wrote:
I think that "psychological time" fits the bill. The observer needs a
a temporal dimension in which to appreciate differences between
states.
OK. That move makes coherent your attempt to derive physics,
and makes it even compatible with the sort of a
6 matches
Mail list logo
