To try to avoid confusion on what I meant I find my model telling me that
all metaverses will experience the injection of new information to some non
zero degree. Some metaverses are Turing computable between such
events. The new information is as if from a random external oracle. The
"to th
>Science.
>I am in your corner, however I spoke about
the "official" terror of science establishment, the editors, tenure-professors,
Nobel people, >etc. control freaks. This type of science is perfectly
described in today's post of CMR in his points, identifying "reductionist
science":
Reply to Bruno's Tuesday, June 29, 2004 10:13 AM
post
Subject: Re: Mathematical Logic, Podnieks'page
Dear Bruno, it seems our ways of expressing
thoughts and sights is so different that in spite of many agreeable
points a detailed discussion would grow out of the framework of the
list.
I
I have enjoyed my first looks at Podnieks' page. Bruno thanks for the URL .
My issue is that my model while it has changed many times seems to
persistently return me to the idea that while some metaverses may be
otherwise Turing computable all metaverses are subject to input from what
might be
>Reply-BM: We surely differ. I am not sure the word "science" really
refers to anything.
>Scientific attitude exists though. About it the words and expressions like
*curiosity*, *modesty*, *clarity*, *willingness to share*, etc.. comes to my
mind.
>I agree there has been, in the human story, att
At 15:38 28/06/04 -0400, John M wrote:
JM: Science in my terms is the edifice of reductionist imaging
(observations) of topically selected models, as it developed over the
past millennia: subject to the continually (gradually) evolving (applied)
math formalism. Will be back to that.
Reply-BM:
6 matches
Mail list logo
