I have been wondering about the possibility that all possible worlds exist,
but sequentially rather than simultaneously, under a conservative cosmology
with assumptions as follows:
1. There exists one, and only one, real, physical universe;
2. While it is possible to simulate any subset of thi
Hi everyone! I have been a fan of this list for some time, reading the
archive. I am an attorney with no educational background in science, so
I probably will mostly keep my mouth shut and continue to read. With
that said, I do have a great deal of interest in these topics, and have
read a n
Stathis -
> I would have guessed
> that as the universe expands, chemical and nuclear reactions are less likely
> to occur, in the same way as chemical reaction rates are proportional to the
> concentration the reagents. On the other hand, it is not clear to me how
> more exotic processes such
On 18 July 2004 Hal Finney wrote:
QUOTE-
We had some discussion a while back about a paper which proposed some
similar ideas, http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/hep-th/0208013, Disturbing
implications of a cosmological constant. If you want to look in the
archives, the thread was called "Doomsday-like argume
Stathis Papaioannou writes:
> On 18 July 2004 Hal Finney wrote:
> > We had some discussion a while back about a paper which proposed some
> > similar ideas, http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/hep-th/0208013, Disturbing
> > implications of a cosmological constant. If you want to look in the
> > archives, the
5 matches
Mail list logo
