Hi John,
At 17:19 26/07/04 -0400, John M wrote:
Bruno, (and ClassG)
We have an overwhelming ignorance about Ks and Ks. We don't know their
logical built, their knowledege-base, their behavior.
Indeed.
Is the K vs K rule a physical, or rather human statement, when - in the
latter case there may
At 09:54 27/07/04 -0700, Hal Finney wrote:
I am confused about how belief works in this logical reasoner of type 1.
Suppose I am such a reasoner. I can be thought of as a theorem-proving
machine who uses logic to draw conclusions from premises. We can imagine
there is a numbered list of
Oops, I too was a victim of viral paranoia this AM and committed wholesale
deletion of all attachment laden emails in my box including, apparently,
Russel's. letter. Can someone send or forward me a copy? (of the letter not
a virus) ;)
Thanks!
Please, Russell,
for the peace of our minds who
I just read the New Scientist article Quantum Rebel last night about
Shariar Afshar's work on the double slit experiment. Ingenious as the
experiment is, I really don't think it says anything about different
interpretations of QM. Indeed, the outcome of the experiment is just
what I'd expect from
I also deleted everything immediately, fearing the viral possibilities of
the attachments.
Jeanne
- Original Message -
From: CMR [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2004 9:40 AM
Subject: Re: Quantum Rebel
Oops, I too was a victim of viral paranoia this
The probability that Russell's message contained a virus was low (he uses
linux) but nonzero. So, I guess that's bad news for some of my copies in the
multiverse.
- Oorspronkelijk bericht -
Van: Jeanne Houston [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aan: CMR [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Verzonden:
Saibal Mitra fwded
It may be a question of interpretations of interpretations of QM,
however on the basis of the New Scientist article, I don't believe
Afshar have shown a problem with the complementarity principle.
I agree. But imagine the usual two-slit set-up. And this
unusual screen, to
This is confusing because I believe p has two different meanings.
One is that I have written down p with a number in front of it,
as one of my theorems. The other meaning is the string Bp.
But that string only has meaning from the perspective of an outside
observer. To me, as the machine, it is
Saibal Mitra wrote:
Now in the article, Afshar claims to have measured which slit the
photon passed through and verified the existence of an interference
pattern. However, this is not the case - without the wires in
place to detect the presence of the interference pattern, photons
arriving at
Actually, looking at the diagram and explanation of the experiment posted at
http://www.kathryncramer.com/wblog/archives/000674.html I think Saibal Mitra
and the sci.physics.research poster I quoted may have misunderstood what
happened in this experiment. I may have misunderstood, but it
Not me but Russell wrote that. I should have made that clear better when I
posted Russell's attachment (Sorry Russell!).
- Oorspronkelijk bericht -
Van: Jesse Mazer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Verzonden: Wednesday, July 28, 2004 08:59 PM
Onderwerp: Re: Quantum Rebel
Can anyone tell me why the body of the email is blank to some people?
Is it some overzealous defang program the removes the body as well as
the attachment?
I don't care if the attachment is removed - it doesn't contain
information - its purpose is to authenticate the letter only, and can
be
12 matches
Mail list logo
