Hi Jesse
You wrote:
Well, what I get from your answer is that you're justifying the idea
that the All is inconsistent in terms of your own concept of evolving
Somethings, not in terms of inconsistent axiomatic systems.
Just the reverse. The evolving Somethings inevitably encompass the
Hal,
With reference to your inconsistent TOE model (which I do not claim to
understand), you state My approach solves these issues for ME . . . You
also state All universes over and over is in my belief system more
satisfying and may be able to put some handle on ideas such as self aware
Hi Norman:
I suppose a person would hope that a theory they propose is in some way
global but I was talking about the idea that belief is a factor in
mathematical as well as other discourse.
Bruno said in an earlier post in this thread:
A proposition P is logically possible, relatively to
1) a
Hal Ruhl wrote:
You wrote:
Well, what I get from your answer is that you're justifying the idea
that the All is inconsistent in terms of your own concept of evolving
Somethings, not in terms of inconsistent axiomatic systems.
Just the reverse. The evolving Somethings inevitably encompass the
4 matches
Mail list logo