Hi Russell:
At 06:50 PM 1/10/2005, you wrote:
It is an assumption (or perhaps postulate: the Time postulate). It is
amenable to debate, just as Euclid's axioms are. I offer the following
points in its favour:
1) Observation is the process of creating information, by
distinguishing differences be
Comments below, please.
John M
- Original Message -
From: "Hal Ruhl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sunday, January 09, 2005 8:16 PM
Subject: Re: Belief Statements
> Hi Russell:
>
> My dynamic in part produces worlds that appear to have time as a property
> but also produces all kinds of
- Original Message -
From: Norman Samish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: 09 January 2005 19:28
Subject: Re: Belief Statements
> I can't conceive of space-time being anything other than infinite. The
> existence of "all logically possible worlds" seems necessary in infinite
> space-time, whe
- Original Message -
From: "Hal Finney" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: 09 January 2005 16:21
Subject: Re: Belief Statements
> Alastair Malcolm writes:
> > For my own part, I give strong credibility (>50%) to the existence of
many
> > worlds in some guise or other, and in particular to the e
4 matches
Mail list logo
