My All:Nothing model - an explanation

Hi Bruno: I have attempted to answer some of your questions below. I have removed some terms and replaced others to improve clarity [I think]. This effort also improved the statement of the model. As I have tried to point out in other posts I believe the model has many features in common wi

Re: My All Nothing model compacted, was: Re: Summary of seed ideas ...

Le 23-sept.-05, à 16:29, Hal Ruhl a écrit : Hi Bruno: At 06:04 AM 9/23/2005, you wrote: Le 22-sept.-05, à 18:12, John M a écrit : Bruno: according to your (and Marc's?) definition, is Hal's work a "TOEandTON"? The problem, for me, is with the "T" (both in TOE and TON). I cannot ju

Rép : Summary of seed ideas for my developing T OE - 'The Sentient Centered Theo...

Le 24-sept.-05, à 18:14, John M a écrit : Dear Logician : I copy from your post below: But if there are features of reality not explained by the TOE, we still can expect that the TOE will be able to justify---or "meta-justify"--- why it cannot explain those features. * 'Everything' includes se