RE: Why is there something rather than nothing?

2006-03-05 Thread Jonathan Colvin
Dominic wrote: > that that question itself is absurd, if there was 'nothing' and there > was a 'why' to that 'nothing'; if it had a cause, then there wouldn't > be nothing, there would be the cause: something. The question is "why is there something", not "why is there nothing". The question d

Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?

2006-03-05 Thread Kim Jones
Somebody once wrote a piece of music which in fact involved not writing a piece of music at all. The score of the piece merely instructs the pianist to sit down, open the lid of the piano and wait out a period of 4' 33" then close the piano lid and walk off. Many people who "heard" it at t

Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?

2006-03-05 Thread Dominic Tarr
that that question itself is absurd, if there was 'nothing' and there was a 'why' to that 'nothing'; if it had a cause, then there wouldn't be nothing, there would be the cause: something. so at no point can any explanation refer to a state where the universe had not yet decided to go either 'not

Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?

2006-03-05 Thread George Levy
Norman Samish wrote: >"Why is there something rather than nothing?" > >When I heard that Famous Question, I did not assume that "nothing" was >describable - because, if it was, it would not be "nothing." I don't think >of "nothing" as an empty bitstring - I think of it as the absence of a >bi

Why is there something rather than nothing?

2006-03-05 Thread Norman Samish
"Why is there something rather than nothing?" When I heard that Famous Question, I did not assume that "nothing" was describable - because, if it was, it would not be "nothing." I don't think of "nothing" as an empty bitstring - I think of it as the absence of a bitstring - as "no thing." Gi

Re: belief, faith, truth

2006-03-05 Thread Hal Ruhl
Hi Russell and the list: I have been very distracted and am trying to catch up on the discussions. At 01:35 AM 2/1/2006, you wrote: >I don't agree with equating the vacuum with "Nothing", although I know >a few people do. The vacuum still has a wealth of information >associated with it. > >In t

Unprovable Physical Truths and Unwinnable Arguments

2006-03-05 Thread George Levy
There is a great article entitled "The Limts of Reason" by Gregory Chaitin in the March Issue of  Scientific American page 74. I quote:  "So perhaps mathematicians should not try to prove everything. Sometimes they should try to add new axioms. That is what you have got to do when you are faced