Jason Resch writes:
Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
What about when multiple equally valid OM's exist? I don't agree that they
are all perceived.
If I am to be duplicated and one of the copies tortured, I am worried,
because this is subjectively
equivalent to expecting torture with 1/2
Le 18-janv.-07, à 06:38, Brent Meeker a écrit :
Bruno Marchal wrote:
To avoid to much posts in your mail box, I send all my comments in
this post,
Hi Brent,
1a) Brent meeker wrote (quoting Jim Heldberg) :
Atheism is not a religion, just as a vacant lot is not a type of
Le 11-janv.-07, à 15:15, Russell Standish a écrit :
I would further hypothesise that all intelligences must
arise evolutionarily.
I do believe this too, but once an intelligence is there it can be
copied in short time. Dishonest people do that with ideas, publishers
do that with
Bruno Marchal writes:
1c) Brent wrote (to Stathis):
How is this infinite regress avoided in our world? By
consciousness
not representing the rest of the world.
That is an interesting idea. You could elaborate a bit perhaps? I do
agree with your most of your recent replies
Bruno Marchal writes:
Le 18-janv.-07, à 04:10, Stathis Papaioannou a écrit :
I would say relative to a theory explaining the appearances, not
just to the appearances.
Well, it is relative to appearance, but people go on to theorise that
these appearances are true reality.
5 matches
Mail list logo
