Mark,
you asked interesting questions, but I think the fundamental ones are still
'out there':
MP:(bold and in bold):
"I mean the big and unanswered question is WHERE are numbers?
I would ask (joining your heresy):
1. Where did numbers come from? (an answer may be: They are GOD to believe
in).
2.
Bruno:
> With comp, what holds 'your lot" together are the relation between
> numbers. The apparent third person infinite regression stops at the
> level of those relations. The first person is most probably confronted
> with many infinities, but this should not be considered as
> problematica
John M, et al,
It is a fact of existential experiencing that
minds are typically so innured to their millieu
and environmental encounters that 'alternative
interpretations' are overlooked and missed to
appreciation and understanding.
--- When it became apparent to me that
QM -and- Relativity
It's getting such and sucher - the multiple, back-and-forth gets dizzying.
So I will copy certain sentences of the "Stathistical" discussion for
reflection.-Below is the orig.Maze.
John
---
> JM earlier: What else can we 'imagine'? Ideational -- of whom? Mine?
> Yours?
4 matches
Mail list logo
