At the very least could it be said the AI is conscious of the question?
Would this awareness of even a single piece of information be sufficient to
make it conscious?
Jason
On 6/2/07, "Hal Finney" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Various projects exist today aiming at building a true Artificial
>
On Jun 1, 2007, at 6:53 AM, Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
>
> I assure you, at least one entity in the universe is conscious: me.
> If evolution could have made me a zombie, it would have. Therefore,
> it seems reasonable to assume that evolution couldn't help but
> grant me consciousness as a
Quentin Anciaux wrote:
> I'd like to add a "definition" of consciousness.
>
> Consciousness is the inner narative composed of sounds/images/feelings which
> present itself as 'I'. What is (the origin/meaning) of 'I', I don't know,
> but 'I' is the consciousness.
>
> Quentin
>
John McCarthy n
I'd like to add a "definition" of consciousness.
Consciousness is the inner narative composed of sounds/images/feelings which
present itself as 'I'. What is (the origin/meaning) of 'I', I don't know,
but 'I' is the consciousness.
Quentin
On Saturday 02 June 2007 22:13:30 Hal Finney wrote:
> V
On Saturday 02 June 2007 22:13:30 Hal Finney wrote:
> but is it
> something an AI could logically conclude?
>
> Hal
I guess if it was conscious... sure ;)
Quentin
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Ev
Various projects exist today aiming at building a true Artificial
Intelligence. Sometimes these researchers use the term AGI, Artificial
General Intelligence, to distinguish their projects from mainstream AI
which tends to focus on specific tasks. A conference on such projects
will be held next
Hi,
I'd say that I'm more sure of my own existence than anything else.
Even if consciousness is an illusion, this illusion still is and need
explanation... This illusion ask question about herself I can hear my
thought, saying the're not real will not make them disappear.
Quentin
On Friday 01
Mohsen Ravanbakhsh wrote:
> I haven't seen the video yet, but I guess what you said are the words of
> mysterians.
> They believe that we can not solve some problems at all (mainly the
> mind-body problem), as if it's like teaching quantum physics to monkeys.
> You'd not accomplish that, becaus
On 02/06/07, "Hal Finney" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Another possibility is that Boltzmann Brains arising out of chaos are the
> > observer moments which associate to produce the first person appearance
> of
> > continuity of consciousness and an orderly universe. Binding together
> > observer m
Le 01-juin-07, à 18:47, Torgny Tholerus a écrit :
>
> Bruno Marchal skrev:
>> One more question: supposing you are correct, is it ethically wrong to
>> torture you? Is it ethically wrong to torture an entity without
>> consciousness (supposing we could be sure of that) even if it acts
>> like it
I haven't seen the video yet, but I guess what you said are the words of
mysterians.
They believe that we can not solve some problems at all (mainly the
mind-body problem), as if it's like teaching quantum physics to monkeys.
You'd not accomplish that, because they're incapable of understanding it.
A criticism to the whole idea.
We actually do not have a definition of observer. We don't know what
structure is needed for consciousness and even what phenomenon is the basic
cause of a mental entity.
In such an atmosphere one can oppose in the same (somehow in-scientific)
way; for example I say:
12 matches
Mail list logo