[EMAIL PROTECTED] skrev:
(7) From (3) mathematical concepts are objectively real. But there
exist mathematical concepts (inifinite sets) which cannot be explained
in terms of finite physical processes.
How can you prove that infinite sets exists?
--
Torgny Tholerus
On 28/08/07, David Nyman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What if someone simply claimed that they couldn't see how circulation
was the same as cardiovascular activity: they could understand that
the heart was a pump, the blood a fluid, the blood vessels conduits,
but the circulatory system as a
On Aug 28, 6:31 pm, Torgny Tholerus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] skrev:
(7) From (3) mathematical concepts are objectively real. But there
exist mathematical concepts (inifinite sets) which cannot be explained
in terms of finite physical processes.
How can you prove
On 28/08/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What if someone simply claimed that they couldn't see how circulation
was the same as cardiovascular activity: they could understand that
the heart was a pump, the blood a fluid, the blood vessels conduits,
but the circulatory
Le 27-août-07, à 13:27, David Nyman a écrit :
On 16/08/07, Bruno Marchal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you drop a pen, to
compute EXACTLY what will happen in principle, you have to consider
all
comp histories in UD* (the complete development of the UD) going
through your actual state
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Aug 28, 12:53 am, Stathis Papaioannou [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 27/08/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I accept that there is more than one way to describe reality, and I
accept the concept of supervenience, but where I differ with you
On 28/08/07, Bruno Marchal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you drop a pen, to
compute EXACTLY what will happen in principle, you have to consider
all
comp histories in UD* (the complete development of the UD) going
through your actual state (the higher level description of it, which
On Aug 29, 4:20 am, Brent Meeker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for spelling it out.
(1) Mathematical concepts are indispensible to our explanations of
reality.
So are grammatical concepts.
No they aren't. Grammatical concepts are human creations, which is
precisely shown by the
On Aug 29, 4:03 am, Brent Meeker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is this special quality of subjective experience: that which is
left over after all the objective (third person knowable) information
is accounted for. Nevertheless, the subjective experience can be
perfectly reproduced by
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Aug 29, 4:20 am, Brent Meeker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for spelling it out.
(1) Mathematical concepts are indispensible to our explanations of
reality.
So are grammatical concepts.
No they aren't. Grammatical concepts are human creations, which is
10 matches
Mail list logo
