Mirek,
Le 28-nov.-07, à 17:32, Mirek Dobsicek a écrit :
Hi Bruno,
I'm ready. Luckily, it is not long time ago, I've received my
university
degree in CS, so it was rather easy to follow :-)
Sincerely,
Mirek
Thanks for telling me that you are ready. Now I feel a bit guilty
because
Quentin Anciaux skrev:
Hi,
Le Wednesday 28 November 2007 09:56:17 Torgny Tholerus, vous avez écrit :
You only need models of cellular automata. If you have a model and
rules for that model, then one event will follow after another event,
according to the rules. And after that event
Le Thursday 29 November 2007 17:22:59 Torgny Tholerus, vous avez écrit :
Quentin Anciaux skrev:
Hi,
Le Wednesday 28 November 2007 09:56:17 Torgny Tholerus, vous avez écrit :
You only need models of cellular automata. If you have a model and
rules for that model, then one event will
Quentin Anciaux skrev:
Le Thursday 29 November 2007 17:22:59 Torgny Tholerus, vous avez écrit :
There is a difference between unlimited and infinite. Unlimited
just says that it has no limit, but everything is still finite. If you
add something to a finite set, then the new set will
Le Thursday 29 November 2007 18:25:54 Torgny Tholerus, vous avez écrit :
Quentin Anciaux skrev:
Le Thursday 29 November 2007 17:22:59 Torgny Tholerus, vous avez écrit :
There is a difference between unlimited and infinite. Unlimited
just says that it has no limit, but everything is still
Quentin Anciaux skrev:
Le Thursday 29 November 2007 18:25:54 Torgny Tholerus, vous avez écrit :
As soon as you talk about the set N, then you are making a closure
and making that set finite.
Ok then the set R is also finite ?
Yes.
The only possible way to talk about
Le Thursday 29 November 2007 18:52:36 Torgny Tholerus, vous avez écrit :
Quentin Anciaux skrev:
Le Thursday 29 November 2007 18:25:54 Torgny Tholerus, vous avez écrit :
As soon as you talk about the set N, then you are making a closure
and making that set finite.
Ok then the set R is
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 18:25:54 +0100
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Theory of Everything based on E8 by Garrett Lisi
Quentin Anciaux skrev:
Le Thursday 29 November 2007 17:22:59 Torgny Tholerus, vous avez écrit :
Quentin Anciaux skrev:
Le Thursday 29 November 2007 18:52:36 Torgny Tholerus, vous avez écrit :
Quentin Anciaux skrev:
What is the production rules of the noset R ?
How do you define the set R?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Construction_of_real_numbers
Choose your
Jesse Mazer skrev:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
As soon as you talk about the set N, then you are making a closure
and making that set finite.
Why is that? How do you define the word set?
The only possible way to talk about
something without limit, such as natural
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 19:55:20 +0100
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Theory of Everything based on E8 by Garrett Lisi
Jesse Mazer skrev:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
As soon as you talk about the set N, then
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 19:01:38 +0100
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bijections (was OM = SIGMA1)
Bruno Marchal skrev:
But infinite ordinals can be different, and still have the same
cardinality. I have given
Marc, please, allow me to write in plain language - not using those
fancy words of these threads.
Some time ago when the discussion was in commonsensically more
understandable vocabulary, I questioned something similar
to Günther, as pertaining to numbers - the alleged generators of
'everything'
13 matches
Mail list logo