Rex Allen wrote:
Brent,
So my first draft addressed many of the points you made, but it that
email got too big and sprawling I thought.
So I've focused on what seems to me like the key passage from your
post. If you think there was some other point that I should have
addressed, let me
Rex Allen skrev:
Brent,
So my first draft addressed many of the points you made, but it that
email got too big and sprawling I thought.
So I've focused on what seems to me like the key passage from your
post. If you think there was some other point that I should have
addressed, let me
Hi,
Ma connection at home is no functioning. So I am temporarily
disconnected. I hope I will be able to solve that problem. I am sending
here some little comments from my office.
I include some more material for Kim and Marty, and others, just to
think about, in case I remain disconnected for
Bruno Marchal skrev:
Le 22-juil.-09, à 10:27, Torgny Tholerus a écrit :
Rex Allen skrev:
Brent:
Do these mathematical objects really exist? I'd say they
have
logico-mathematical existence, not the same existence as
tables and
Hi Brent,
I really appreciate the help and I hate to impose on your
patience but...(see below)
- Original Message -
From: Brent Meeker meeke...@dslextreme.com
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2009 5:24 PM
Subject: Re: The seven step series
Ma connection at home is again functioning. I am happy to have solved
the problem rather quickly.
On 22 Jul 2009, at 13:54, David Nyman wrote:
2009/7/22 Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be:
Ma connection at home is no functioning.
As a linguistic aside, Bruno has cleverly expressed the
On 22 Jul 2009, at 14:12, Torgny Tholerus wrote:
The most general form of existence is: All mathematical possible
universes exist. Our universe is one of those mathematical
possible
existing universes.
This is non sense. Proof: see UDA. Or interrupt me when you have an
2009/7/19 Rex Allen rexallen...@gmail.com:
In your view, Bruno (or David, or anyone else who has an opinion),
what kinds of things actually exist? What does it mean to say that
something exists?
This is naturally the $64k question for this list - or any other, for
that matter (pun
On 22 July, 16:01, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
Ma connection at home is again functioning. I am happy to have solved
the problem rather quickly.
On 22 Jul 2009, at 13:54, David Nyman wrote:
2009/7/22 Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be:
You thought you could make fun of the
Marty,
Brent wrote:
On 21 Jul 2009, at 23:24, Brent Meeker wrote:
Take all strings of length 2
00 01 10 11
Make two copies of each
00 00 01 01 10 10 11 11
Add a 0 to the first and a 1 to the second
000001
m.a. wrote:
Hi Brent,
I really appreciate the help and I hate to impose on
your patience but...(see below)
- Original Message -
From: Brent Meeker meeke...@dslextreme.com
mailto:meeke...@dslextreme.com
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
On 22 Jul 2009, at 17:56, David Nyman wrote:
2009/7/19 Rex Allen rexallen...@gmail.com:
In your view, Bruno (or David, or anyone else who has an opinion),
what kinds of things actually exist? What does it mean to say that
something exists?
This is naturally the $64k question for this
2009/7/22 Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be:
explanatory redundancy. Hence I'm a monist (or a non-dualist) who -
given the singular incorrigibility of first-person 'experiential
reality' - concludes that though whatever underlies remains forever
*unknowable* it must nonetheless perforce be
David Nyman wrote:
2009/7/22 Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be:
explanatory redundancy. Hence I'm a monist (or a non-dualist) who -
given the singular incorrigibility of first-person 'experiential
reality' - concludes that though whatever underlies remains forever
*unknowable* it must
Going a step further... (see below)
- Original Message -
From: Brent Meeker meeke...@dslextreme.com
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2009 12:57 PM
Subject: Re: The seven step series
m.a. wrote:
Hi Brent,
I really appreciate the help
Bruno,
See desperate questions below.
marty a.
- Original Message -
From: Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2009 11:01 AM
Subject: Re: Dreams and
m.a. wrote:
*Going a step further... (see below)*
**
- Original Message -
From: Brent Meeker meeke...@dslextreme.com
mailto:meeke...@dslextreme.com
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2009 12:57 PM
Subject: Re:
David Nyman wrote:
2009/7/23 Brent Meeker meeke...@dslextreme.com:
If I understand you correctly, this is similar to the explication of I by
Thomas Metzinger in his book The Ego Tunnel. He expresses it as the self
being transparent. We look *through* it but not *at* it, and necessarily
Hi Brent,
You are asserting monism. But the One, the ur-stuff, is
ineffable/unknowable.
So when we place ourselves in the world it is by making distinctions within
the
unity. To become distinct from the background (the One) is what it means to
be
RITSIAR. Right?
Brent
How do
Brian Tenneson wrote:
Hi Brent,
You are asserting monism. But the One, the ur-stuff, is
ineffable/unknowable.
So when we place ourselves in the world it is by making distinctions within
the
unity. To become distinct from the background (the One) is what it means to
be
RITSIAR.
Brent Meeker wrote:
Brian Tenneson wrote:
Hi Brent,
You are asserting monism. But the One, the ur-stuff, is
ineffable/unknowable.
So when we place ourselves in the world it is by making distinctions within
the
unity. To become distinct from the background (the One) is what
21 matches
Mail list logo
