Hi Ronald,
You may ask Günther Greindl, who asked me references for the UDA and
AUDA, and he put them on the list archive.
guenther.grei...@gmail.com
You can take a look on the references in my theses.
http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/lillethesis/these/node79.html#SECTION0013
m.a. wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Flammarion"
> To: "Everything List"
> Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2009 6:30 PM
> Subject: Re: Yablo, Quine and Carnap on ontology
>
>
>
>
>
> On 17 Sep, 14:12, "m.a." wrote:
>
>> - Original Message -
>> From: "Flammarion"
>> To:
- Original Message -
From: "Flammarion"
To: "Everything List"
Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2009 6:30 PM
Subject: Re: Yablo, Quine and Carnap on ontology
On 17 Sep, 14:12, "m.a." wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Flammarion"
> To: "Everything List"
> Sent: Thursday
On Sep 17, 11:17 pm, Flammarion wrote:
> > Has it? I thought we were discussing whether CTM made any meaningful
> > commitments as a physical theory, not whether physics can or can't
> > include consciousness per se. Now you raise the question, I don't
> > believe it can, simply because in com
2009/9/17 Flammarion :
> Yep, and if the conclusion is ontological, the process that reaches it
> is ontological.
>
> Bruno thinks he can reach an ontological assumption starting with pure
> maths.
> But he can't. "mathematical existence" means that mathematicians take
> certain "exists" statemen
On 17 Sep, 14:12, "m.a." wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Flammarion"
> To: "Everything List"
> Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2009 6:17 AM
> Subject: Re: Yablo, Quine and Carnap on ontology
>
> > On 16 Sep, 21:42, "m.a." wrote:
> >> - Original Message -
> >> From: "Flam
On 17 Sep, 00:02, David Nyman wrote:
> Has it? I thought we were discussing whether CTM made any meaningful
> commitments as a physical theory, not whether physics can or can't
> include consciousness per se. Now you raise the question, I don't
> believe it can, simply because in common with
On 17 Sep, 00:52, David Nyman wrote:
> 2009/9/16 Flammarion :
>
> > The knowabilitry of a claim about what powers numbers
> > have can only depend on what labels are correctly attached.
> > Petrol is not flammable just becaue I attached the label
> > "flammable" to it. Petrol *Is* flammable, an
2009/9/17 Bruno Marchal :
> Then for the inside/personal views, the whole of human math including
> Cantor paradise cannot be enough to describe the human mind. It is
> more general:
In that case, what light does the comp approach shed on the 'causal
significance' of the inside view - i.e. with
Dear Bruno,
it is not very convincing when you dissect my sentences and interject
assuring remarks on statements to come later in the sentence, negating such
remarks in advance, on a different basis.
I argued that - upon what you (and the rest of the multimillion
mathematicians past and present)
On 16 Sep 2009, at 18:33, Brent Meeker wrote:
>
> David Nyman wrote:
>> 2009/9/16 Flammarion :
>>
>>
I find that I can't real say what the difference is supposed to be
between numbers existing mathematically and numbers existing
Platonically, other than that different labels are b
On 16 Sep 2009, at 23:01, Brent Meeker wrote:
>
> m.a. wrote:
>>
>> - Original Message -
>> From: "Flammarion"
>> To: "Everything List"
>> Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2009 11:25 AM
>> Subject: Re: Yablo, Quine and Carnap on ontology
>>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 16 Sep, 15:51, "m.a." wrote:
On 16 Sep 2009, at 18:12, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>
> If it is OK, in the next post we begin to address the computability
> issue. I give you an anticipative exercise or subject reflection.
> This is a deep exercise. Its solution leads to the notion of
> universal function and universal num
Hi John,
On 17 Sep 2009, at 15:14, John Mikes wrote:
>
>
> You went out of your way and did not save efforts to prove how
> inadequate and wrong (y)our number system is. (ha ha).
Wrong ?
>
> Statement: if square-rooting is right (allegedly, and admittedly)
Well, it is certainly right if w
Bruno,
I loved your post on the square root of "2"!
(I also laughed at it, to stay at the puns).
You went out of your way and did not save efforts to prove how inadequate
and wrong (y)our number system is. (ha ha).
Statement: *if square-rooting is right* (allegedly, and admittedly) *then
THERE I
- Original Message -
From: "Flammarion"
To: "Everything List"
Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2009 6:17 AM
Subject: Re: Yablo, Quine and Carnap on ontology
>
>
>
> On 16 Sep, 21:42, "m.a." wrote:
>> - Original Message -
>> From: "Flammarion"
>> To: "Everything List"
>> Sent:
On 16 Sep, 21:42, "m.a." wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Flammarion"
> To: "Everything List"
> Sent: Wednesday, September 16, 2009 11:25 AM
> Subject: Re: Yablo, Quine and Carnap on ontology
>
> > On 16 Sep, 15:51, "m.a." wrote:
> >> the ocean of virtual particles which may g
17 matches
Mail list logo
