On 17 Jul 2010, at 05:51, Allen Rex wrote:
The thesis posited by the book(*) is a bigger problem for Bruno's
theory that mine.
(*)c.f. The Evolution of
Reason by William S. Cooper.
Are you saying that the book provides evidences that we are not Turing
emulable?
Or that the prime
Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2010 16:10:23 -0700
Subject: RE: Civilization-level quantum suicide
From: her...@acm.org
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Mark, if you're not kidding here I honestly think you may be experiencing
some kind of mental disorder, perhaps a manic state (good
On 7/18/2010 1:01 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 17 Jul 2010, at 05:51, Allen Rex wrote:
The thesis posited by the book(*) is a bigger problem for Bruno's
theory that mine.
(*)c.f. The Evolution of
Reason by William S. Cooper.
Are you saying that the book provides evidences that we are
Well, it's impossible to know what's going on with you based on a few
email messages but it definitely sounds like it could be a manic state to
me--this sort of grandiosity and boundless confidence in one's own
abilities and powers is common in mania.
Of course it is. But note that I'm not
Well...
Did Gene Ray died the other night as you predicted ?
No, then go consult.
Simple as that.
Regards,
Quentin
2010/7/18 Mark Buda her...@acm.org
Well, it's impossible to know what's going on with you based on a few
email messages but it definitely sounds like it could be a manic
Did Gene Ray died the other night as you predicted ?
No, then go consult.
Simple as that.
I don't know whether he died or not. Google doesn't seem to know either.
Since none of you seem interested in helping me (and I don't blame you,
but it was worth a shot) I'm going to send him an email
Jesse, Mark,
On 18 Jul 2010, at 17:20, Jesse Mazer wrote:
Well, it's impossible to know what's going on with you based on a
few email messages but it definitely sounds like it could be a manic
state to me--this sort of grandiosity and boundless confidence in
one's own abilities and
On 18 Jul 2010, at 17:38, Brent Meeker wrote:
On 7/18/2010 1:01 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 17 Jul 2010, at 05:51, Allen Rex wrote:
The thesis posited by the book(*) is a bigger problem for Bruno's
theory that mine.
(*)c.f. The Evolution of
Reason by William S. Cooper.
Are you
Mark, we may be wrong, but none of what you said makes very much sense
for us. Some things you said may make sense, but seems to me humanly
communicable only through math, fiction, art, poetry, ... and stands
always very far away from any literal certainty.
I know it doesn't make sense. I
On 18 Jul 2010, at 17:38, Brent Meeker wrote:
Unless the W. Cooper's book refutes the movie graph argument, for
example by justifying Jack Mallah's claim that consciousness stop
supervening physically on a machine in case a physical piece of the
machine, which is supposed to have no physical
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 10:01 PM, Mark Buda her...@acm.org wrote:
Get it? Good grief, even if the
stuff I'm saying taken as a whole doesn't make sense, at least focus on
one piece at a time and you will agree that I'm making perfect sense.
Mark, seriously, you're not. I worked on a psychiatric
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 10:01 PM, Mark Buda her...@acm.org wrote:
Get it? Good grief, even if the
stuff I'm saying taken as a whole doesn't make sense, at least focus on
one piece at a time and you will agree that I'm making perfect sense.
Mark, seriously, you're not. I worked on a
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 10:42 PM, Mark Buda her...@acm.org wrote:
You worked on a psychiatric ward but you never understood them. If you had
taken the time to interact with them, one on one, and share their lives
and hopes and dreams, you would have been able to help them figure it out.
That
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 10:42 PM, Mark Buda her...@acm.org wrote:
You worked on a psychiatric ward but you never understood them. If
you had taken the time to interact with them, one on one, and share
their lives and hopes and dreams, you would have been able to help
them figure it out.
On 7/18/2010 1:38 PM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 18 Jul 2010, at 17:38, Brent Meeker wrote:
On 7/18/2010 1:01 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 17 Jul 2010, at 05:51, Allen Rex wrote:
The thesis posited by the book(*) is a bigger problem for Bruno's
theory that mine.
(*)c.f. The Evolution of
15 matches
Mail list logo
