On Feb 18, 4:00 pm, benjayk wrote:
> 1Z wrote:
>
> > On Feb 17, 10:38 pm, benjayk wrote:
> >> Brent Meeker-2 wrote:
>
> >> > On 2/17/2011 12:27 PM, benjayk wrote:
>
> >> >> Brent Meeker-2 wrote:
>
> >> >>> On 2/17/2011 10:14 AM, benjayk wrote:
>
> >> 1Z wrote:
>
> >> > On Feb 17, 3:10
On Feb 18, 3:07 pm, benjayk wrote:
> 1Z wrote:
>
> > On Feb 17, 8:52 pm, benjayk wrote:
> >> 1Z wrote:
>
> >> > On Feb 17, 6:14 pm, benjayk wrote:
> >> >> 1Z wrote:
>
> >> >> > On Feb 17, 3:10 pm, benjayk wrote:
> >> >> >> 1Z wrote:
>
> >> >> >> >> >> Comp will imply that such a primary matte
On Feb 18, 3:06 pm, Jason Resch wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 6:15 AM, 1Z wrote:
>
> > On Feb 18, 5:30 am, Jason Resch wrote:
> > > Peter,
>
> > > Correct me if I am wrong but I think we have established some things we
> > > agree on:
>
> > > Consciousness is informational
> > No
>
> > > Th
On Feb 18, 2:03 pm, "Stephen Paul King" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> -Original Message-
> From: 1Z
> Sent: Friday, February 18, 2011 7:04 AM
> To: Everything List
> Subject: Re: Maudlin & How many times does COMP have to be false before its
>
> false?
>
> >>On Feb 17, 8:52 pm, benjayk wrote:
>
> sn
Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Bruno Marchal wrote:
>>>
>>> Now, just recall that "Platonia" is based on classical logic where
>>> the
>>> falsity f, or 0 = 1, entails all proposition. So if you insist to say
>>> that 0 = 1, I will soon prove that you owe to me A billions of
>>> dollars, and
On Feb 20, 7:12 pm, Bruno Marchal wrote:
> On 20 Feb 2011, at 13:13, benjayk wrote:
> >> So we can say
> >> things like, "Sherlock Holmes lived at 10 Baker Street" are true,
> >> even
> >> though Sherlock Holmes never existed.
> > Whether Sherlock Holmes existed is not a trivial question. He
On Feb 20, 6:53 pm, Bruno Marchal wrote:
> On 20 Feb 2011, at 00:39, benjayk wrote:
> You will find the best and the worst. Podnieks' page is not too
> bad.http://www.ltn.lv/~podnieks/
"a correct philosophical position of a mathematician should be: a)
Platonism - on working days - when I'm do
On Feb 19, 12:34 am, Bruno Marchal wrote:
> On 18 Feb 2011, at 17:13, benjayk wrote:
>
>
>
> > Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
> >> Hi,
>
> >> What do you mean by Platonia?
>
> >> The kind of Platonia in Tegmark or in Peter's (1Z) post does not make
> >> sense for mathematicians. Even if you are using a
On Feb 18, 8:52 pm, Bruno Marchal wrote:
> On 18 Feb 2011, at 12:53, 1Z wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Feb 18, 9:48 am, Bruno Marchal wrote:
> >> Hi,
>
> >> What do you mean by Platonia?
>
> >> The kind of Platonia in Tegmark or in Peter's (1Z) post does not make
> >> sense for mathematicians. Even if
Thank you for your answers. I have still a coupled of questions.
> But with computer science, intuition can be misleading.
Intuition could be misleading not only in computer science. I know.
>> Moreover my first person view assumes that there are some others
>> first person views, for example,
On 22 Feb 2011, at 07:58, Russell Standish wrote:
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 03:46:45PM -0800, Travis Garrett wrote:
Hi Stephen,
Sorry for the slow reply, I have been working on various things and
also catching up on the many conversations (and naming conventions)
on
this board. And thanks
From: Bruno Marchal
Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2011 4:19 AM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Vic Stenger on information models
On 21 Feb 2011, at 19:53, Brent Meeker wrote:
This, from my friend Vic Stenger, might be of interest to you Bruno.
Original Message --
On 21 Feb 2011, at 21:16, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
Thank you for your answer. I am also sorry for confusion as with
"What mind-body research says about the development of mind from a
single cell and then its death?"
I have meant
"What mind-body research says about the development of mind fro
On 21 Feb 2011, at 19:53, Brent Meeker wrote:
This, from my friend Vic Stenger, might be of interest to you Bruno.
Original Message
My latest HuffBlog is at
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/victor-stenger/the-new-information-theol_b_825648.html
Vic
I read it, but Vic seems
On 21 Feb 2011, at 17:34, benjayk wrote:
Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 20 Feb 2011, at 13:13, benjayk wrote:
Brent Meeker-2 wrote:
On 2/19/2011 3:39 PM, benjayk wrote:
Bruno Marchal wrote:
Isn't it enough to say everything that we *could* describe
in mathematics exists "in platonia"?
Peter, Andrew,
I am still trying to figure out what is it that you don't understand
in the seventh step of the UDA, as opposed to the eighth step.
I resend my question to 1Z, as promise, with some slight changes.
Most of 1Z critics of the reversal physics/number-theory consequence
of comp w
16 matches
Mail list logo
