On 09 Jun 2011, at 07:14, Rex Allen wrote:
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 5:42 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be
wrote:
On 07 Jun 2011, at 00:52, Rex Allen wrote:
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 6:13 PM, Russell Standish li...@hpcoders.com.au
wrote:
It is not that hard to get, so would be worth your
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 5:58 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 09 Jun 2011, at 07:14, Rex Allen wrote:
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 5:42 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 07 Jun 2011, at 00:52, Rex Allen wrote:
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 6:13 PM, Russell Standish
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 5:58 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
? On the contrary. It was your argument against determinism which I took as
incompatible with science or scientific attitude. But third person
determinism does not entails first person determinism, nor do determinism in
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 10:00 AM, Rex Allen rexallen31...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm also fine with block-multiverse. And with a block-mindscape.
Neither of which allow for free will. Since both of which are static,
unchanging, and unchangeable - making it impossible that anyone could
have done
On 09 Jun 2011, at 18:20, Rex Allen wrote:
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 5:58 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be
wrote:
? On the contrary. It was your argument against determinism which I
took as
incompatible with science or scientific attitude. But third person
determinism does not entails
On 09 Jun 2011, at 17:00, Rex Allen wrote:
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 5:58 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be
wrote:
On 09 Jun 2011, at 07:14, Rex Allen wrote:
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 5:42 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be
wrote:
On 07 Jun 2011, at 00:52, Rex Allen wrote:
On Mon, Jun 6,
Hi Colin,
On 07 Jun 2011, at 09:42, Colin Hales wrote:
Hi,
Hales, C. G. 'On the Status of Computationalism as a Law of Nature',
International Journal of Machine Consciousness vol. 3, no. 1, 2011.
1-35.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/S1793843011000613
The paper has finally been published.
On 6/9/2011 1:17 PM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 09 Jun 2011, at 18:20, Rex Allen wrote:
Dr. StrangeDennett: Or How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love
Determinism.
Repurposing the term free will is a propaganda move, to make the
medicine go down easier.
Science redefines the term all the
On 6/9/2011 1:17 PM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
I do have a precise theory, (not in my thesis, though) and free-will
begins with Löbianity. From this I infer that very plausibly, worms
and ants (and perhaps communists) have no free-will, but that spiders,
octopus, mice, dogs and humans have it. I
On 6/9/2011 11:34 AM, Jason Resch wrote:
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 10:00 AM, Rex Allen rexallen31...@gmail.com
mailto:rexallen31...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm also fine with block-multiverse. And with a block-mindscape.
Neither of which allow for free will. Since both of which are
On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 02:15:47PM -0700, meekerdb wrote:
He seems to disagree with compatibilism; but he essentially agrees
on the facts; he just doesn't want to use the phrase free will
because he thinks that's redefining the terms to mean something
other than what people normally mean.
On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 10:17:46PM +0200, Bruno Marchal wrote:
I do have a precise
theory, (not in my thesis, though) and free-will begins with
Löbianity. From this I infer that very plausibly, worms and ants
(and perhaps communists) have no free-will, but that spiders,
octopus, mice, dogs
On 6/9/2011 3:41 PM, Russell Standish wrote:
On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 02:15:47PM -0700, meekerdb wrote:
He seems to disagree with compatibilism; but he essentially agrees
on the facts; he just doesn't want to use the phrase free will
because he thinks that's redefining the terms to mean
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 2:34 PM, Jason Resch jasonre...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 10:00 AM, Rex Allen rexallen31...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm also fine with block-multiverse. And with a block-mindscape.
Neither of which allow for free will. Since both of which are static,
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 8:18 PM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 6/9/2011 3:41 PM, Russell Standish wrote:
As I always say, free will is the ability to do something stupid. And
from an evolutionary point of view, that is actually a useful ability.
We are in violent agreement. :-)
15 matches
Mail list logo
