On 29 Aug 2011, at 20:07, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Aug 29, 10:28 am, Jason Resch jasonre...@gmail.com wrote:
A brain also undergoes physical changes just as elaborate and
intricate (topologically) as the experiences taking place through
it,
I agree with the above.
yet the brain's
Bruno Marchal wrote:
Bruno Marchal wrote:
Bruno Marchal wrote:
Nevertheless I think truth and goodness are
very intimately related.
Plato and Plotinus identify God and the Good. Now, this is
related to
very subtle point with the comp hyp.
Like you, and like all Platonist, I
On Aug 30, 4:06 am, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 29 Aug 2011, at 20:07, Craig Weinberg wrote:
Definitely, but the reasons that we have for causing those changes in
the semiconductor material are not semiconductor logics. They use
hardware logic to to get the hardware to do
I just had an interesting idea with regards to our
ontological/epistemological debate. Could it be that the number 0 is
conscious itself, by virtue of being itself (and all numbers share that
property, because the make just sense relative to 0)? This would pretty much
merge our ideas, because we
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 11:18 PM, Evgenii Rudnyi use...@rudnyi.ru wrote:
A molecule in a cell will behave exactly the same as a molecule
anywhere else in the universe. Do you believe otherwise? Do you have
any experimental evidence?
Here you first have to define what a molecule is. It
On Aug 30, 11:29 am, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 30 Aug 2011, at 14:43, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Aug 30, 4:06 am, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 29 Aug 2011, at 20:07, Craig Weinberg wrote:
Definitely, but the reasons that we have for causing those changes
On 30 Aug 2011, at 16:13, benjayk wrote:
I just had an interesting idea with regards to our
ontological/epistemological debate. Could it be that the number 0 is
conscious itself, by virtue of being itself (and all numbers share
that
property, because the make just sense relative to 0)?
On Aug 30, 5:31 pm, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 8/30/2011 9:41 AM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
If you deem all phenomena in the
universe to be a priori mechanistic, then that word has no meaning. If
you want it to mean something then you have to allow that some
phenomena are not
Hi Jason,
Interleaving...
On 8/29/2011 8:27 AM, Jason Resch wrote:
On Aug 29, 2011, at 12:00 AM, Stephen P. King
stephe...@charter.net wrote:
On 8/28/2011 11:06 PM, Jason Resch wrote:
Capillary action is not a violation of the laws of physics. What
about substance monism
On 8/29/2011 6:05 PM, John Mikes wrote:
Stephen and Jason,
interesting discours, but you use concepts that beg for my questioning.
Dualism may be an observation based on phenomena we misunderstand and
explain to the level of present theories. A violation of the laws of
physics asks: are those
On 8/30/2011 11:29 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 30 Aug 2011, at 14:43, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Aug 30, 4:06 am, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 29 Aug 2011, at 20:07, Craig Weinberg wrote:
Definitely, but the reasons that we have for causing those changes in
the semiconductor
11 matches
Mail list logo
