On 05 Sep 2011, at 21:02, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
Realism and nominalism in philosophy are related to universals (I
guess that numbers could be probably considered as universals as
well). A simple example:
A is a person;
B is a person.
Does A is equal to B? The answer is no, A and B are
On 06 Sep 2011, at 02:26, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Sep 5, 1:01 pm, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
May be Mechanism will be refuted, but meanwhile it illustrates that
some explanation exists. If mechanism is correct it does explains
completely gravity, time, space, quanta, and it
On Sep 5, 10:39 pm, Stathis Papaioannou stath...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Sep 5, 2011 at 4:05 PM, Craig Weinberg whatsons...@gmail.com wrote:
Nothing really new has turned up in the physics underlying the brain
in over a century,
I'm assuming you're just being thoughtlessly condescending
On Sep 6, 3:13 am, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 06 Sep 2011, at 02:26, Craig Weinberg wrote:
When you say that mechanism explains qualia almost completely, are you
talking about the 1-p (plural) sequestering of it, the non
computability of it, or is there something else? Does
On 06 Sep 2011, at 16:47, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Sep 6, 3:13 am, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 06 Sep 2011, at 02:26, Craig Weinberg wrote:
When you say that mechanism explains qualia almost completely, are
you
talking about the 1-p (plural) sequestering of it, the non
Let me try it this way. Could we say that universals exist already in
the 3d person view and they are independent from the 1st person view?
Evgenii
On 06.09.2011 09:00 Bruno Marchal said the following:
On 05 Sep 2011, at 21:02, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
Realism and nominalism in philosophy are
I was talking about realism in a sense that universals exist (I am not
sure if this could be generalized for all things). My first naive/crazy
idea was that this could give some basis to produce qualia related to
notation. Neurons somehow distill universals from things and report them.
On the
On 9/6/2011 12:43 PM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
I was talking about realism in a sense that universals exist (I am not sure if this
could be generalized for all things). My first naive/crazy idea was that this could give
some basis to produce qualia related to notation. Neurons somehow distill
On Sep 6, 1:16 pm, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 06 Sep 2011, at 16:47, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Sep 6, 3:13 am, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 06 Sep 2011, at 02:26, Craig Weinberg wrote:
When you say that mechanism explains qualia almost completely, are
you
On 9/6/2011 1:30 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Sep 6, 1:16 pm, Bruno Marchalmarc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 06 Sep 2011, at 16:47, Craig Weinberg wrote:
On Sep 6, 3:13 am, Bruno Marchalmarc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 06 Sep 2011, at 02:26, Craig Weinberg wrote:
When you say that mechanism
On Sep 6, 5:02 pm, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
On 9/6/2011 1:30 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
Absent qualia, and vanishing
sensations already occurs in many consciousness pathologies, in
general due to brain troubles, like with Alzheimer.
Right, but the human sensations do not seem
On 9/6/2011 5:42 PM, Craig Weinberg wrote:
If all bodies are computations, then what's the difference?
You're just being obtuse. All bodies are composed of atoms, so what's the difference
between them.
Brent
If you say
we are not our bodies, you can only be saying that we are not our
12 matches
Mail list logo
