Re: UDA reducing physics to number theory

2011-11-21 Thread Johnathan Corgan
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 7:19 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote: > I will answer Johnathan's question asap, but I have three busy days and I > want to take some time to do that. The answer is, imo, contained in the > conclusion of UDA, and made clearer (technically) with AUDA, but I guess I > shopuld explai

Re: The consciousness singularity

2011-11-21 Thread John Mikes
Dear Russell, thanks for the reply - I am not a scholar of Rosen's oeuvre, but as far as I know he addressed 'other' questions and called the "What is Life" an 'ill' formulated question. Sure, he emphasized metabolism and repair as main functionalities of what we usually call 'life' (here on Earth'

Re: UDA refutation take 2

2011-11-21 Thread Bruno Marchal
On 20 Nov 2011, at 21:54, Russell Standish wrote: On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 12:23:57PM +0100, Bruno Marchal wrote: Ricardo, On 19 Nov 2011, at 16:33, R AM wrote: Has Eric Vandenbush written a paper about how complex numbers are derived from UDA? He has some health problem, and rarely finish

Re: UDA refutation take 2

2011-11-21 Thread Bruno Marchal
On 20 Nov 2011, at 17:27, Jason Resch wrote: Hi Bruno, I had few questions regarding some of the things said in your post. On Sat, Nov 19, 2011 at 3:49 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote: On 19 Nov 2011, at 03:02, Pierz wrote: David Deutsch's idea of a good explanation is one that closely matches

Re: UDA reducing physics to number theory

2011-11-21 Thread Bruno Marchal
Hi, I will answer Johnathan's question asap, but I have three busy days and I want to take some time to do that. The answer is, imo, contained in the conclusion of UDA, and made clearer (technically) with AUDA, but I guess I shopuld explain this more clearly. Below I can answer to Stephen