On 09 May 2012, at 21:39, R AM wrote:
On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 8:23 PM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be
wrote:
On 09 May 2012, at 17:09, R AM wrote:
nothing could also be obtained by removing the curly brackets
from the empty set {}.
N... Some bit of blank remains. If it was
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 3:07 AM, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
I agree with that point. But I also wanted to make the point that there
is social concept of free will that has to do with responsibility, and it
is compatible with different dualist, determinist, and non-deterministic
Below there is a message from Facebook where his author briefly
describes a book with papers about Libet's experiment. I guess that this
should be useful for discussions about free will.
Evgenii
---
Review :Conscious Will and Responsibility: A Tribute to Benjamin Libet
The editors of
Bruno and Ricardo:
...unless you remove the boundries as well - I think.
That would end up for nothing with a POINT, which is still a point and
not nothing. (If you eliminate the point???)
John M
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 2:55 AM, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 09 May 2012, at
Stathis Papaioannou wrote
My definition: free will is when you're not sure you're going to do
something until you've done it.
On Tue, May 8, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote:
So if carefully weigh my options and decide on one it's not free will?
You don't know what the outcome all
On 5/10/2012 1:08 PM, John Clark wrote:
Stathis Papaioannou wrote
My definition: free will is when you're not sure you're going to do
something until you've done it.
So by your definition is a there ever a time when you're not exercising free
will?
On Tue, May 8, meekerdb
6 matches
Mail list logo
