On 22 Jun 2012, at 20:24, meekerdb wrote:
On 6/22/2012 12:14 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
2) The fact that there is no algorithm to decide if a program
compute some function does not ential that we cannot recognize what
do some program.
You mean there is no algorithm that, given any program
On 22 Jun 2012, at 20:42, Stephen P. King wrote:
On 6/22/2012 4:12 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 20 Jun 2012, at 21:32, Stephen P. King wrote:
What does first person indeterminacy show other than the
independence of the process that generates the 1p from any
particular case of physical s
On 22.06.2012 08:03 Stephen P. King said the following:
On 6/22/2012 1:50 AM, Brian Tenneson wrote:
I have many questions.
One is "what if truth were malleable?" --
HI Brian,
If it was malleable, how would we detect the modifications? If our
"standards" of truth varied, how could we tell? Thi
On 22 Jun 2012, at 20:55, meekerdb wrote:
On 6/22/2012 11:42 AM, Stephen P. King wrote:
You don't need 1p-indeterminacy for this. The independance requires
only that if a brain support consciousness in a particular
computation not using neuron 323, and if physical supervenience is
true,
On 23 Jun 2012, at 09:47, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
On 22.06.2012 08:03 Stephen P. King said the following:
On 6/22/2012 1:50 AM, Brian Tenneson wrote:
I have many questions.
One is "what if truth were malleable?" --
HI Brian,
If it was malleable, how would we detect the modifications? If our
On 6/23/2012 1:53 AM, meekerdb wrote:
On 6/22/2012 10:21 PM, Stephen P. King wrote:
On 6/23/2012 12:37 AM, meekerdb wrote:
On 6/22/2012 6:49 PM, Stephen P. King wrote:
On 6/22/2012 8:04 PM, meekerdb wrote:
On 6/22/2012 4:49 PM, Stephen P. King wrote:
Hameroff is a crackpot. If microtubles we
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 Stephen P. King wrote:
> > This quantization of time is easily seen as problematic when we consider
> that SR tells us that any granulation of time is equivalent to a grnulation
> of space which has observable effect.
>
All physicists agree that neither Special Relativity
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 Bruno Marchal wrote:
> > Something is not primitive if you can derive it from something simpler.
>
You don't think the electron is primitive, so show me how to derive its
mass, spin, and electrical charge from something simpler.
John K Clark
--
You received this message
8 matches
Mail list logo
