On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 8:51 PM, meekerdb wrote:
> On 7/18/2012 6:28 AM, R AM wrote:
>
> Dear Bruno, compatibilist free-will is defined as "without coercion".
> Metaphisical (non-compatibilist) free-will is a property or ability people
> claim to have when making decisions (i.e. they are so abso
free markets produce the types of social systems that best enable
people to interact in a way that puts them on the oxytocin-empathy?
Really I thought it was each one on its own.
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 6:47 AM, meekerdb wrote:
>
> This may be of interest to those recently discussing free-ri
Le 18-juil.-12, à 15:28, R AM a écrit :
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 2:12 PM, Bruno Marchal
wrote:
Well ... you are the one who continue to mock free-will, despite
many of us have given new precise, and compatibilist, definition of
it, and you do this without making precise that you limit you
Le 18-juil.-12, à 19:26, John Clark a écrit :
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 8:12 AM, Bruno Marchal
wrote:
If doubt is not productive then it is not reasonable, if a physicist
or chemist or biologist or geologist or astronomer doubts
"physicalism" then there is nothing more for him to do and he
On 7/18/2012 3:52 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
Not for the atheists nearby. They vindicate that the believe that
there is no God.
You need to distinguish what you mean by "God". When written
capitalized as a proper noun it refers to a person/being who created
the world and wants to be obey
Le 18-juil.-12, à 20:48, meekerdb a écrit :
On 7/18/2012 5:12 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
Let g be the proposition that God exists. And let me be the
proposition that Matter (primitive matter) exists.
Then, by the most common definition of atheism, atheists are doubly
believer as they verif
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 12:33 PM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
> Le 18-juil.-12, à 15:28, R AM a écrit :
>
>
>> On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 2:12 PM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>
> I gave a definition of compatibilist free-will which is not "without
> coercion". I define free-will as the ability to make willing
Le 18-juil.-12, à 21:08, meekerdb a écrit :
On 7/18/2012 10:32 AM, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
For example, the fantastic, uinmatched success the judeo-christian
civilization until XVIII century at least, as measured in objective
evolutionary terms.
You mean the one that squelched Greek science
On 7/19/2012 1:43 AM, R AM wrote:
free markets produce the types of social systems that best enable
people to interact in a way that puts them on the oxytocin-empathy?
Really I thought it was each one on its own.
I think that's the interesting point: those two are not contrary.
Brent
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 5:19 PM, meekerdb wrote:
> On 7/19/2012 1:43 AM, R AM wrote:
>>
>> free markets produce the types of social systems that best enable
>> people to interact in a way that puts them on the oxytocin-empathy?
>> Really I thought it was each one on its own.
>
>
> I think th
On 7/19/2012 6:13 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
Le 18-juil.-12, ą 20:48, meekerdb a écrit :
On 7/18/2012 5:12 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
Let g be the proposition that God exists. And let me be the proposition
that
Matter (primitive matter) exists.
Then, by the most comm
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 Bruno Marchal wrote:
> I define free-will as the ability to make willing-full choice in absence
> of complete information
Complete information is NEVER available, but there is ALWAYS enough
information to make a choice OR there is not enough information to make a
choice; s
On 18.07.2012 22:26 meekerdb said the following:
On 7/18/2012 12:21 PM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
On 18.07.2012 21:08 meekerdb said the following:
On 7/18/2012 10:32 AM, Alberto G. Corona wrote:
For example, the fantastic, uinmatched success the
judeo-christian civilization until XVIII century at
Dear Bruno,
I need to slow down and just address this question of your as it
seems to be the point where we disconnect from understanding each other.
On 7/19/2012 10:22 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
At this stage I will ask you to define "physical".
The physical is the represented as the
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 8:51 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
> Most catholic theologians have already abandoned the idea of an
> omniscient and omnipotent being,
Maybe that's what the smarter ones think privately but that is most
certainly NOT what they preach to their congregation on Sunday, if they
To fix a typo
On 7/19/2012 3:46 PM, Stephen P. King wrote:
Dear Bruno,
I need to slow down and just address this question of your as it
seems to be the point where we disconnect from understanding each other.
On 7/19/2012 10:22 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
At this stage I will ask you to de
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 4:20 PM, Stephen P. King wrote:
> To fix a typo
>
> On 7/19/2012 3:46 PM, Stephen P. King wrote:
>
> Dear Bruno,
>
> I need to slow down and just address this question of your as it seems
> to be the point where we disconnect from understanding each other.
>
> On 7/19/
On 7/19/2012 7:09 PM, Jason Resch wrote:
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 4:20 PM, Stephen P. King
mailto:stephe...@charter.net>> wrote:
To fix a typo
On 7/19/2012 3:46 PM, Stephen P. King wrote:
Dear Bruno,
I need to slow down and just address this question of your as
it s
On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 7:58 PM, Stephen P. King wrote:
> On 7/19/2012 7:09 PM, Jason Resch wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 4:20 PM, Stephen P. King wrote:
>
>> To fix a typo
>>
>> On 7/19/2012 3:46 PM, Stephen P. King wrote:
>>
>> Dear Bruno,
>>
>> I need to slow down and just addres
19 matches
Mail list logo
