On 5/15/2013 11:00 PM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
On 15.05.2013 21:02 meekerdb said the following:
On 5/15/2013 12:02 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
On 14.05.2013 21:45 meekerdb said the following:
On 5/14/2013 12:29 PM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 14 May 2013, at 19:12, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
On 14.05.20
On 15.05.2013 21:02 meekerdb said the following:
On 5/15/2013 12:02 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
On 14.05.2013 21:45 meekerdb said the following:
On 5/14/2013 12:29 PM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 14 May 2013, at 19:12, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
On 14.05.2013 16:51 Bruno Marchal said the following:
O
On 5/15/2013 12:02 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
On 14.05.2013 21:45 meekerdb said the following:
On 5/14/2013 12:29 PM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 14 May 2013, at 19:12, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
On 14.05.2013 16:51 Bruno Marchal said the following:
On 14 May 2013, at 15:33, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
On Tue, May 14, 2013 Roger Clough wrote:
> In the beginning was the Creator, the One
And so it came to pass that The One asked Himself "why was I there at the
beginning and why was there a beginning at all". But even though The One
was omniscient He did not know the answer to his own questio
On 15 May 2013, at 09:08, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
On 14.05.2013 21:29 Bruno Marchal said the following:
On 14 May 2013, at 19:12, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
...
In the last case, a male bird catches a fish and gives it to the
bride. Could we consider a fish as a sign in this case?
I do not know
On 14 May 2013, at 23:45, John Mikes wrote:
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 3:39 AM, Bruno Marchal
wrote:
On 13 May 2013, at 18:29, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
On 13.05.2013 17:41 Telmo Menezes said the following:
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 10:33 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi
wrote:
Recently I have listened to a
On Tuesday, May 14, 2013 7:14:26 PM UTC+10, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>
> On 14 May 2013, at 04:15, Pierz wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tuesday, May 14, 2013 12:13:19 AM UTC+10, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 13 May 2013, at 09:30, Pierz wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >
>> > On Monday, May 13, 2013 2:49:32 AM UTC+10, B
Conservation of momentum in Leibniz's nonphysical world
This is an adaptation of Leibniz's theory of the conservatioon
of momentum. such as when one billiard ball strikes another,
since their monads are ideas, and ideas cannot
mechanically interact.
We know that the indirectly changed perceptio
On 14 May 2013, at 22:26, meekerdb wrote:
On 5/14/2013 1:18 PM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 14 May 2013, at 21:45, meekerdb wrote:
They have the special status of being humans.
Sure, like termites have the special status of being termites.
And we could define a word "termiticial" to deno
On 14.05.2013 21:29 Bruno Marchal said the following:
On 14 May 2013, at 19:12, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
...
In the last case, a male bird catches a fish and gives it to the
bride. Could we consider a fish as a sign in this case?
I do not know what happens under comp but I personally see no
po
On 14.05.2013 23:45 John Mikes said the following:
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 3:39 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
...
* The difference between natural and artificial is ... artificial.
And thus it is natural ... for creatures which are developing some ego.
"artificial" is a human indexical. Even
On 14.05.2013 21:45 meekerdb said the following:
On 5/14/2013 12:29 PM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 14 May 2013, at 19:12, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
On 14.05.2013 16:51 Bruno Marchal said the following:
On 14 May 2013, at 15:33, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
...
If you are monist, that distinction is q
12 matches
Mail list logo
