Dr. Mikes, question-
Do you feel that the search engine duckduckgo really prevents spying by PRISM
or do you think it may just be a 'honey trap' of sorts, or that the software is
not all it is promoted as being? Would you advise virtual desktop software as a
security method, or is this a wast
I read Sarfatti's website, Stardrive.org, too, and I am not sure he does the
Leibniz idealism as you do. He seems more attuned to whether the future, or
future beings from the distant future, try to influence their past. He doesn't
claim its people or our descendants, just that information is b
On 22 Jun 2013, at 22:43, John Mikes wrote:
Bruno I admire you for responding to everything, no matter how
irrelevant.
Have a pleasant summer
It is my way, I always interpret favorably, without too much attention
of words, until I see the real discrepancies if there is one. I can
relate
Bruno I admire you for responding to everything, no matter how irrelevant.
Have a pleasant summer
John
On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 7:44 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
> On 22 Jun 2013, at 03:26, Roger Clough wrote:
>
>
> Materialists believe apparently strange things, such as that mind is
> matter.
>
>
Roger, we 'read' you too much. If you have to use this silly word (Ccness):
I'm preaching over the past 21 years that it is a PROCESS. As in: RESPONSE
TO RELATIONS.
No Leibnitz or else, no 'subject' or 'object' no fuss.
It is a basic process to the TOTALITY (not human,not fellow DNA-bearers,
not ev
On 22 Jun 2013, at 15:54, Roger Clough wrote:
For some time, I have been trying to contact you to inform you
that
consciousness = subject + object
but you people keep trying to solve the problem
consciousness = object.
Absolutely not.
On the contrary, object are mental or dreamed content.
On Sat, Jun 22, 2013 at 9:54 AM, Roger Clough wrote:
> For some time, I have been trying to contact you to inform you
> that
> consciousness = subject + object
> but you people keep trying to solve the problem
> consciousness = object.
>
If people don't read you it's because they don't see the
For some time, I have been trying to contact you to inform you
that
consciousness = subject + object
but you people keep trying to solve the problem
consciousness = object.
which is useful to some extent, but is not consciousness.
That's materialism and it's the wrong problem.
Only by using
For some time, I have been trying to contact you to inform you
that
consciousness = subject + object
but you people keep trying to solve the problem
consciousness = object.
which is useful to some extent, but is not consciousness.
That's materialism and it's the wrong problem.
Only by using
For some time, I have been trying to contact you to inform you
that
consciousness = subject + object
but you people keep trying to solve the problem
consciousness = object.
which is useful to some extent, but is not consciousness.
That's materialism and it's the wrong problem.
Only by usin
On 22 Jun 2013, at 03:26, Roger Clough wrote:
Materialists believe apparently strange things, such as that mind is
matter.
What if mind is matter ?
Then mind would be quantized, and there would be particles of mind
(psychon, as someone named it).
Comp would be false, but some other m
Hi JACK SARFATTI
Consciousness = subject + object = subjective world + objective world
Nice physics, very erudite, but If there's no subject, then
there's no consciousness. But if you include a subject, the consciousness
problem is trivial. You don't to keep having conferences about the
"mys
12 matches
Mail list logo
