Liz,
As far as I know, Max does not have a theory. He just has a hypothesis with
nothing theoretical to back it up.
One aspect of his hypothesis is that the creation of matter requires math
that is both consistent and complete.
Whereas Godel has seemingly to me proven that such math does not exist.
On 9/11/2014 6:36 PM, LizR wrote:
Obviously I haven't read the PDF file with Chs 1-8, which may take me a while - but I do
(mildly) take issue with this assertion.
Mathematics is merely a description of nature. Nature can operate
mathematically
(adverb), but cannot be claimed to ‘be’ t
Or chs 9-14 of course! (In fact I hadn't even opened your 2nd email when I
wrote that...)
I will do my best to have a look at the book, and if I have any sensible
comments I'll get back with them.
On 12 September 2014 13:36, LizR wrote:
> Obviously I haven't read the PDF file with Chs 1-8, whic
Obviously I haven't read the PDF file with Chs 1-8, which may take me a
while - but I do (mildly) take issue with this assertion.
Mathematics is merely a description of nature. Nature can operate
mathematically (adverb), but cannot be claimed to ‘be’ the mathematics.
Being predictive with/using ma
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Bruno Marchal
Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2014 10:14 AM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Fish can communicate and UNDERSTAND each other!
On 09 Sep 2014, at 05:16, 'Chris de
On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 9:42 PM, John Mikes wrote:
> Samiya,
> thanks for the post - your interest by reading what I wrote. Your
> URL-stuff is much more involved than being answered immediately, so please,
> give me some time to cinsider.
>
That's funny for a guy that is usually: "*LIZ! *You c
6 matches
Mail list logo
