Re: A thought on MWI and its alternative(s)

2017-05-31 Thread Bruce Kellett
On 1/06/2017 6:28 am, David Nyman wrote: On 31 May 2017 at 04:55, Bruce Kellett > wrote: On 31/05/2017 12:30 pm, Pierz wrote: Thanks for these clarifications Bruce. I find your explanations to be very lucid and helpful - they also confirm my own

Re: A thought on MWI and its alternative(s)

2017-05-31 Thread Bruce Kellett
On 1/06/2017 4:43 am, Bruno Marchal wrote: On 31 May 2017, at 04:01, Bruce Kellett wrote: On 30/05/2017 9:35 pm, Bruno Marchal wrote: On 30 May 2017, at 11:28, Telmo Menezes wrote: I get your point with decoherence. Again, I would say that it all depends on theories of mind. What does mind su

Re: A thought on MWI and its alternative(s)

2017-05-31 Thread David Nyman
On 31 May 2017 at 04:55, Bruce Kellett wrote: > On 31/05/2017 12:30 pm, Pierz wrote: > > Thanks for these clarifications Bruce. I find your explanations to be very > lucid and helpful - they also confirm my own understanding. > > > Thank you for the kind comments, I try my best to be clear. > > I

Re: A thought on MWI and its alternative(s)

2017-05-31 Thread Bruno Marchal
On 31 May 2017, at 04:01, Bruce Kellett wrote: On 30/05/2017 9:35 pm, Bruno Marchal wrote: On 30 May 2017, at 11:28, Telmo Menezes wrote: I get your point with decoherence. Again, I would say that it all depends on theories of mind. What does mind supervene on? Perhaps it is true that ever

Re: A thought on MWI and its alternative(s)

2017-05-31 Thread David Nyman
On 31 May 2017 18:39, "Bruno Marchal" wrote: On 30 May 2017, at 17:00, David Nyman wrote: On 30 May 2017 at 14:48, Bruno Marchal wrote: > > On 30 May 2017, at 14:10, Telmo Menezes wrote: > > On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 1:35 PM, Bruno Marchal wrote: >> > > > > >> >> >> Right, I agree with you

Re: A thought on MWI and its alternative(s)

2017-05-31 Thread Bruno Marchal
On 30 May 2017, at 17:00, David Nyman wrote: On 30 May 2017 at 14:48, Bruno Marchal wrote: On 30 May 2017, at 14:10, Telmo Menezes wrote: On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 1:35 PM, Bruno Marchal wrote: Right, I agree with you and Pierz on this. My point was more on what you address below.

Re: Answers to David 4

2017-05-31 Thread David Nyman
On 31 May 2017 at 17:00, Bruno Marchal wrote: > > On 30 May 2017, at 16:44, David Nyman wrote: > > On 30 May 2017 at 13:05, Bruno Marchal wrote: > >> >> On 29 May 2017, at 13:42, David Nyman wrote: >> >> >> >> On 29 May 2017 at 05:27, Brent Meeker wrote: >> >> ​Yes, so the explanatory priority

Re: Answers to David 4

2017-05-31 Thread Bruno Marchal
On 30 May 2017, at 16:44, David Nyman wrote: On 30 May 2017 at 13:05, Bruno Marchal wrote: On 29 May 2017, at 13:42, David Nyman wrote: On 29 May 2017 at 05:27, Brent Meeker wrote: ​Yes, so the explanatory priority is now that of "​we are to extract" over "the physics of which they a

substitution level

2017-05-31 Thread Telmo Menezes
Creating a new thread to avoid causing decoherence on the other one :) >> What if the substitution level turns out to be at a higher level than >> quantum? E.g. at the level of the neurons and their connections and >> activations levels? > > > That would enlarge the uncertainty spectrum on the rea

Re: A thought on MWI and its alternative(s)

2017-05-31 Thread Bruce Kellett
On 31/05/2017 4:40 pm, Pierz wrote: On Wednesday, May 31, 2017 at 3:28:18 PM UTC+10, Brent wrote: Sorry. Something funny with my verizon account. Brent On 5/30/2017 8:09 PM, Pierz Newton-John wrote: > Brent, are you replying from a mobile? I’m still receiving your replies,