On 21/06/2017 4:03 pm, Russell Standish wrote:
On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 12:15:31PM +1000, Bruce Kellett wrote:
On 19/06/2017 10:23 am, Russell Standish wrote:
I know Scott wouldn't go as far as me. For me, all such irreversible
processes are related to conscious entities in some way. Whilst
agre
On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 12:15:31PM +1000, Bruce Kellett wrote:
> On 19/06/2017 10:23 am, Russell Standish wrote:
> >I know Scott wouldn't go as far as me. For me, all such irreversible
> >processes are related to conscious entities in some way. Whilst
> >agreeing that Geiger counters are unlikely t
It depends on how fast automation of jobs occurs? We obvious can make superb
robots for any sort of physical labor, as exemplified by the Boston Dynamics
robot fleet. What is missing-as with all electric cars- is a reliable power
storage format. There seems to be tons or great engineering being
On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 spudboy100 via Everything List <
everything-list@googlegroups.com> wrote:
> The millennials, whom I interact with, Professor, believe that there will
> be a Universal Basic Income (UBI) to rescue them, if they are
> "dis-employed," by automation. I, of course, oppose,
Mr.
Yes, unless the 3rd gen robots also purchase and sell goods and services.
"Humans not welcome!" Ok, thanks ;-)
-Original Message-
From: Hans Moravec
To: spudboy100 via Everything List
Sent: Tue, Jun 20, 2017 7:20 pm
Subject: Re: AI and social destabilization
On 170620, at 6:55 P
> On 170620, at 6:55 PM, spudboy100 via Everything List
> wrote:
>
> Will UBI triumph
Can’t sell if no one is able to buy
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, s
The millennials, whom I interact with, Professor, believe that there will be a
Universal Basic Income (UBI) to rescue them, if they are "dis-employed," by
automation. I, of course, oppose, because I am cynical enough to be aware of
how billionaires decide things, away from journalists and closer
Well compared to AI which was the original topic before the Party members
politicize thing (as they do as meth head craves speed), AI will potentially
see us as taking things in tiny, discrete, units. Swerving back to your
ideology, again, like a lot of bright peeps your ideology kills your
int
> On 170620, at 5:57 PM, Brent Meeker wrote:
>
> And don't get too comfortable because you're not one of those billionaires.
> I'd guess that everyone on this list is in the top 0.002% of the world wealth
> distribution.
>
> Brent
--
You received this message because you are subscribed
On 6/20/2017 1:10 PM, John Clark wrote:
Jobs are already being lost because of the improvements in AI and it's
not just unskilled workers that are in trouble. Don't think that
because you're so smart a AI could never do your job better than you
can so the AI revolution can't effect you person
Jobs are already being lost because of the improvements in AI and it's not
just unskilled workers that are in trouble. Don't think that because you're
so smart a AI could never do your job better than you can so the AI
revolution can't effect you personally
;
in March of this year Blackrock, the
Cupcake, I am fairly well read, in anthropology as well... that's not the issue
here.
You don't grasp what the issue here really is, because your simpletons
worldview is constrained to the tiny little fishbowl that your mind swims.. .
around and around in going over and over, the same tedio
So basically you hate what I say, and thus, do the ad hominem boogie-which is
Joe Leftist mentality to the max. I say this so we both get this stated
precisely. As Patron Saint Homer Simpson might say, "Aw! Cupcakes!" Keep on
keep'in on as you like, because human nature is human nature-read ant
The science of anthropology no less!
Idiocy, such as the offal you serve warm is not somehow transformed into a
wholesome diet by making a naked appeal to authority, such as you now attempt.
Your stream of redneck babble, peppered here and there with sciency sounding
sub phrases remains as
It's how the science of anthropology breaks it down. The people we side with,
identify with, the flaws on our own teams that we ignore. It's all a part of
being a primate, speaking of monkeys and their asses. Your dems will play
things to the max, because, again, it's good for team spirit, and m
Dude, what's it with you and "teams"... are you some kind of social insect...
channeling the hive mind? My team, your team... cupcake, the fishbowl you call
thinking is about as thoughtful as a monkey biting its ass.
On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 11:46 PM, spudboy100 via Everything
List wrote:
16 matches
Mail list logo
