On Saturday, September 7, 2019 at 1:07:33 AM UTC-5, Bruce wrote:
>
> On Sat, Sep 7, 2019 at 4:04 PM Philip Thrift > wrote:
>
>> On Saturday, September 7, 2019 at 12:54:42 AM UTC-5, Brent wrote:
>>>
>>> On 9/6/2019 10:21 PM, Philip Thrift wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Sean Carroll is on a nationwide speakin
On Sat, Sep 7, 2019 at 4:04 PM Philip Thrift wrote:
> On Saturday, September 7, 2019 at 12:54:42 AM UTC-5, Brent wrote:
>>
>> On 9/6/2019 10:21 PM, Philip Thrift wrote:
>>
>>
>> Sean Carroll is on a nationwide speaking tour now evangelizing Many
>> Worlds.
>>
>> What is the predictive power of Ma
On Sat, Sep 7, 2019 at 3:54 PM 'Brent Meeker' via Everything List <
everything-list@googlegroups.com> wrote:
> On 9/6/2019 10:21 PM, Philip Thrift wrote:
>
> Sean Carroll is on a nationwide speaking tour now evangelizing Many Worlds.
>
> What is the predictive power of Many Worlds?
>
>
> None, unl
On Saturday, September 7, 2019 at 12:54:42 AM UTC-5, Brent wrote:
>
>
>
> On 9/6/2019 10:21 PM, Philip Thrift wrote:
>
>
>
> On Saturday, September 7, 2019 at 12:14:07 AM UTC-5, Brent wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 9/6/2019 9:51 PM, Philip Thrift wrote:
>> >
>> > I would put "Horganism" another way.
>
On 9/6/2019 10:21 PM, Philip Thrift wrote:
On Saturday, September 7, 2019 at 12:14:07 AM UTC-5, Brent wrote:
On 9/6/2019 9:51 PM, Philip Thrift wrote:
>
> I would put "Horganism" another way.
>
> Science tells stories/theories, and some are successful in their
> app
On Saturday, September 7, 2019 at 12:14:07 AM UTC-5, Brent wrote:
>
>
>
> On 9/6/2019 9:51 PM, Philip Thrift wrote:
> >
> > I would put "Horganism" another way.
> >
> > Science tells stories/theories, and some are successful in their
> > application. But we don't know if any of the stories a
On 9/6/2019 9:51 PM, Philip Thrift wrote:
I would put "Horganism" another way.
Science tells stories/theories, and some are successful in their
application. But we don't know if any of the stories are the final
ones to be told, or even close to being final. (They probably are
not.) There
I would put "Horganism" another way.
Science tells stories/theories, and some are successful in their
application. But we don't know if any of the stories are the final ones to
be told, or even close to being final. (They probably are not.) There is no
settled story of gravity yet, much less c
On Thursday, September 5, 2019 at 1:38:38 AM UTC-6, Alan Grayson wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wednesday, September 4, 2019 at 4:06:53 PM UTC-6, John Clark wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 2:52 PM Alan Grayson wrote:
>>
>> *> It's claimed the energy is undefined in GR. Regardless, what I am
>>> tr
On Wednesday, September 4, 2019 at 2:37:07 PM UTC-6, Lawrence Crowell wrote:
>
> On Wednesday, September 4, 2019 at 1:48:15 PM UTC-5, Alan Grayson wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wednesday, September 4, 2019 at 4:08:58 AM UTC-6, Lawrence Crowell
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> You also have to include the total gravita
On Thursday, September 5, 2019 at 1:32:24 AM UTC-6, Alan Grayson wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wednesday, September 4, 2019 at 2:37:07 PM UTC-6, Lawrence Crowell
> wrote:
>>
>> On Wednesday, September 4, 2019 at 1:48:15 PM UTC-5, Alan Grayson wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wednesday, September 4, 2019 at 4:08:58
On Sat, Sep 7, 2019 at 5:26 AM Lawrence Crowell <
goldenfieldquaterni...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hogan is a pessimist when it comes to human ability to understand new
> things. He has this "end of science" bug, and I will confess that I suppose
> science will end. In fact I have doubts about Homo sapi
Horgan is wrong because he's apparently never really examined what
sceintific "comprehension" consists of. It is the ability to tell a
consistent story about what happens that has predictive power. It's not
necessarily a story that satisfies people pre-conceptions of what story
would be enter
Hogan is a pessimist when it comes to human ability to understand new
things. He has this "end of science" bug, and I will confess that I suppose
science will end. In fact I have doubts about Homo sapiens being around
before long, so science will clearly at least go down with us. However, I
see
via John Horgan @Horganism
*The Delusion of Scientific Omniscience*
*As time passes, the claim that science can comprehend everything looks
increasingly nutty*
By John Horgan on September 4, 2019
Does anyone still believe that science can explain, well, everything? This
belief was ascendant
On Thursday, September 5, 2019 at 5:25:59 PM UTC+2, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>
> On 4 Sep 2019, at 17:43, PGC > wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wednesday, September 4, 2019 at 4:52:58 PM UTC+2, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2 Sep 2019, at 21:48, Philip Thrift wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Monday, September 2, 2019 a
> On 5 Sep 2019, at 22:11, Philip Thrift wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thursday, September 5, 2019 at 12:22:11 PM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>> On 4 Sep 2019, at 15:52, Philip Thrift >
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Wednesday, September 4, 2019 at 2:37:52 AM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>>
>>> On 3 Sep 2019
Evgenii,
If you have been able to read that paper, maybe you could try to sum up the
main point? Especially if you find it convincing.
Bruno
> On 5 Sep 2019, at 19:53, 'Brent Meeker' via Everything List
> wrote:
>
> Didn't read it as it was behind a paywall.
>
> Brent
>
> On 9/5/2019 9:5
18 matches
Mail list logo
