Re: The size of the universe

On 6/13/2020 4:30 PM, Bruce Kellett wrote: On Sun, Jun 14, 2020 at 3:54 AM smitra > wrote: On 13-06-2020 02:57, Bruce Kellett wrote: > >> My point is that your arguments are >> totally flawed. You stated that a free field theory is analogous to >> a

Re: subjective experience

On 6/25/2020 11:29 PM, Bruno Marchal wrote: On 25 Jun 2020, at 20:02, 'Brent Meeker' via Everything List wrote: On 6/25/2020 8:07 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote: From your irreducible material universe in which you seem to believe? Where did I say "irreducible"? I'm not in the belief busines

Re: Deriving the Born Rule

On 6/25/2020 11:10 PM, Bruno Marchal wrote: With mechanism it is a bit hard to not see the physical multiverse Nobody sees the physical multiverse.  It's as much a theoretical construct as arithmetic is. Nobody sees the moon. It is a theoretical construct, even if a large part of the con

Re: Visible light from two Black Holes with the help of a third

This appears to be different from another announcement of a BH merger that was associated with emission of photons. https://www.forbes.com/sites/startswithabang/2020/06/25/shocking-new-observation-merging-black-holes-really-can-emit-light/#5cc33c7817bf This is the merger of two black holes of 36

Re: subjective experience

> On 26 Jun 2020, at 11:01, Philip Thrift wrote: > > > > On Friday, June 26, 2020 at 1:37:31 AM UTC-5 Bruno Marchal wrote: > > > On 26 Jun 2020, at 00:32, Philip Thrift > > wrote: > > > > > > > > There isn't much more that's been said about the (underdeterminative) > > nature of theorie

Re: subjective experience

On Friday, June 26, 2020 at 1:37:31 AM UTC-5 Bruno Marchal wrote: > > > On 26 Jun 2020, at 00:32, Philip Thrift wrote: > > > > > > > > There isn't much more that's been said about the (underdeterminative) > nature of theories beyond what Duhem, Quine said decades ago. > > Quine is a mater