On 10-04-2022 06:15, Bruce Kellett wrote:
On Sun, Apr 10, 2022 at 10:25 AM smitra wrote:
On 09-04-2022 07:03, Bruce Kellett wrote:
On Sat, Apr 9, 2022 at 11:28 AM smitra wrote:
On 08-04-2022 07:19, Bruce Kellett wrote:
Permanent records do follow from entanglement and decoherence.
Of the two options I will choose your can opener because it's technology.
Future evolution of the cosmos is fascinating but at this point way too far
beyond pour species' grasp, at least nowadays. My view is the we humans need
all the help we can obtain. Much thanks JC.
-Original
On 4/10/2022 3:42 PM, Bruce Kellett wrote:
On Mon, Apr 11, 2022 at 3:07 AM George Kahrimanis
wrote:
Bruce wrote
> [...] But by the rules of MWI, there is also a copy of Alice with result
|1> who meets a Bob who
recorded |1> for the 10th trial. This contradicts QM, in fact it
On Mon, Apr 11, 2022 at 3:07 AM George Kahrimanis
wrote:
> Bruce wrote
> > [...] But by the rules of MWI, there is also a copy of Alice with result
> |1> who meets a Bob who recorded |1> for the 10th trial. This contradicts
> QM, in fact it violates angular momentum conservation, so no such
Bruce wrote
> [...] But by the rules of MWI, there is also a copy of Alice with result
|1> who meets a Bob who recorded |1> for the 10th trial. This contradicts
QM, in fact it violates angular momentum conservation, so no such Alice/Bob
coupling is possible. But, by following the rules of local
On Sun, Apr 10, 2022 at 6:27 AM Lawrence Crowell <
goldenfieldquaterni...@gmail.com> wrote:
> *> this can initially be seen by a possible definition of a dimensionless
> gravitational coupling constant. We are all familiar with Newton’s equation
> of gravitation F = -GMm/r^2 for the force between
On Sat, Apr 9, 2022 at 6:53 PM wrote:
*> Just bothering, but yeah repeat the experiment more than once, confirm
> or deny it's validity. If confirmed then its new physics beyond the
> standard model.*
>
Yes.
> > *My question as always is what might be the impact on our species.*
>
Nobody
7 matches
Mail list logo
