On Sun, Jul 31, 2022 at 07:22:28AM -0400, John Clark wrote:
>
> That won't help because the energy cost involved in making a bitcoin is also
> increasing and it's increasing exponentially; there will never be more than 21
> million bitcoins in the world because if there are 21 million of them the
Physics? Probably mostly from science fiction. If you do ever go on to Twits,
which is not that great a platform, they are very poor at offering up even good
stuff that I follow, such as the traditional journal material like Physics
Today, or AIP, which I follow but the software algorithms
The intelligence community has not been so wonderful to Americans at large for
the last several decades, so if Trumpo wanted to keep the door of communication
open, that was ok with me. The world respects a strong man, and I do mean man
and Joe-Joe's a whimp! Joey also ignored warning from the
This group of essays led by Strominger at Harvard, a few years ago, implies the
storage and reversibility of all data axiomatically, via the interaction of
gravity, and infrared photons. That is my understanding of it. Now, if someone
doesn't think this is right they can always falsify it with
Golly, and I really wanted your respect, Brent! (Glorp!)
-Original Message-
From: Brent Meeker
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Sent: Wed, Aug 3, 2022 8:20 pm
Subject: Re: was China, Now perpetual motion
It's hard to know whether spudboy is a dummy or just plays one online.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xk0INH_DI1M
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this
If a photon is emitted into an infinite universe it is irreversible in
principle, not just FAPP. But it doesn't mean the physical theory is
irreversible. The arrow of time comes from the boundary condition.
Brent
On 8/4/2022 8:47 AM, smitra wrote:
On 04-08-2022 17:41, Alan Grayson wrote:
On Thu, Aug 4, 2022 at 11:47 AM smitra wrote:
On 04-08-2022 17:41, Alan Grayson wrote:
>> I *recall Bruce giving an example of an irreversible process, but I **can't
>> recall the details. AG*
>
>
> *> Probably a FAPP irreversible process.*
>
If states X and Y can both produce Z then it's
On 04-08-2022 17:41, Alan Grayson wrote:
I recall Bruce giving an example of an irreversible process, but I
can't recall the details. AG
Probably a FAPP irreversible process.
Saibal
On Thursday, August 4, 2022 at 6:39:04 AM UTC-6 Jason wrote:
On Thu, Aug 4, 2022, 5:23 AM Alan Grayson
I recall Bruce giving an example of an irreversible process, but I can't
recall the details. AG
On Thursday, August 4, 2022 at 6:39:04 AM UTC-6 Jason wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 4, 2022, 5:23 AM Alan Grayson wrote:
> > I meant to write that information conservation depends on reversibility!
> How
On Thu, Aug 4, 2022, 5:23 AM Alan Grayson wrote:
> I meant to write that information conservation depends on reversibility!
How solid is that assumption? AG
I think it is pretty good.
I think reversibility is part of it. Certainly in a reversable Newtonian
kind of physics (no GR and no QM,
On Wed, Aug 3, 2022 at 8:21 PM Brent Meeker wrote:
> * > It's hard to know whether spudboy is a dummy or just plays one online.*
>
It's what happens when one learns physics from Twitter, the same place
Spudboy formed his political worldview.
John K ClarkSee what's on my new list at
On Wed, Aug 3, 2022 at 7:53 PM wrote:
*> wish Don or Joe was chummy with VLAD! *
Do you also wish that when VLAD tells Biden one thing and his own
intelligence service tells him the exact opposite Biden takes the side of
the Russians and not be Americans like Trump did? Do you wish Biden
I meant to write that information conservation depends on *reversibility! *How
solid is that assumption? AG
On Thursday, August 4, 2022 at 1:31:31 AM UTC-6 Alan Grayson wrote:
> I assume information conservation depends on irreversibility. How solid is
> the latter assumption? AG
--
You
I assume information conservation depends on irreversibility. How solid is
the latter assumption? AG
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to
15 matches
Mail list logo
