reality in important ways (e.g. infinities
and infinitesimals which don't actually exist in external reality).
I can explain further if anyone is interested, or you can read about it in
my book...
Edgar Owen
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Ev
Hi, I just joined the group and have a few questions since it's the first
Google Group I'm on.
First I assume the group must be moderated since it seems to take quite a
while for my posts to show up. Is this so and who is/are the moderator(s).
Second I thought I set my settings to get all posts
to function within it.
Yes, computations include logic as well as math.
Best,
Edgar
On Friday, December 20, 2013 6:52:54 PM UTC-5, Edgar Owen wrote:
>
> All,
>
> The fundamental nature of reality is examined in detail in my recent book
> on Reality available on Amazo
All,
The question of whether God exists is meaningless without first giving some
definition of what is meant by God, of how God is defined. Otherwise everyone
is talking about different things and nothing will go anywhere.
If you need a God there is only one possible rational definition and tha
Jason, John, and Bruno,
One must distinguish here between consciousness itself (the subject of the Hard
Problem), and the contents of consciousness and their structure (the subjects
of the Easy Problems).
The contents and their structure are most certainly computed by the minds of
organisms, b
Liz,
No, that doesn't make Reality subject to the halting problem. The halting
problem is when a computer program is trying to reach some independently
postulated result and may or may not be able to reach it.
Reality doesn't have any problem like this. It just computes the logical
results of
that human math and logic are distinct from the actual math and logic that
> computes reality. The human version is a generalized and extended
> approximation of the actual that differs from the actual logico-mathematical
> structure of reality in important ways (e.g. infinities and
reality's logico-mathematical system.
Edgar
On Dec 22, 2013, at 6:44 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
> On 21 Dec 2013, at 00:52, Edgar Owen wrote:
>
>> All,
>>
>> The fundamental nature of reality is examined in detail in my recent book on
>> Rea
t differs from the actual logico-mathematical
> structure of reality in important ways (e.g. infinities and infinitesimals
> which don't actually exist in external reality).
>
> I can explain further if anyone is interested, or you can read about it in my
> book...
>
013, at 5:14 PM, meekerdb wrote:
> On 12/20/2013 3:52 PM, Edgar Owen wrote:
>> All,
>>
>> The fundamental nature of reality is examined in detail in my recent book on
>> Reality available on Amazon under my name.
>>
>> Marchal is on the right track, but reality
All,
The proof is simply the fact that the time traveling twins meet up again with
different clock times, but always in the exact same present moment. This proves
beyond any doubt there are two kinds of time, clock time which varies by
relativistic observer, and the time of the present moment (
Yes, of course it is set to that. We'll see if this gets posted
Edgar
On Dec 23, 2013, at 2:12 PM, Quentin Anciaux wrote:
> Hi,
> I'm using gmail and it works flawlessly. Just check when replying that the
> address is set to "everything-list@googlegroups.com" (it should normally
> default t
d extended
> approximation of the actual that differs from the actual logico-mathematical
> structure of reality in important ways (e.g. infinities and infinitesimals
> which don't actually exist in external reality).
>
> I can explain further if anyone is interested, or you can read a
13 matches
Mail list logo
