Re: Stephen Hawking: Philosophy is Dead

2012-08-01 Thread RMahoney
Bruno wrote: And my (older) definition asks for one more thing: it is that the subject know (is aware or is conscious) about that inability and that he can still make the decision. There is a reflexion on the possibilities. If not, all non sentient beings have trivially free will. This is

Re: free will and mathematics

2012-06-11 Thread RMahoney
On Monday, June 11, 2012 10:45:16 AM UTC-5, RAM wrote: But what I'm saying here is not ontological determinism but in fact, about the subjective experience. I'm defending that we cannot imagine ourselves in exactly the same subjective situation and still think that we could have done

Re: Free will in MWI

2012-06-04 Thread RMahoney
On Jun 3, 4:38 pm, Craig Weinberg whatsons...@gmail.com wrote: On Jun 3, 4:48 pm, RMahoney rmaho...@poteau.com wrote: On Jun 1, 7:08 pm, Craig Weinberg whatsons...@gmail.com wrote: On Jun 1, 7:07 pm, RMahoney rmaho...@poteau.com wrote: On Jun 1, 1:31 pm, Craig Weinberg whatsons

Re: Free will in MWI

2012-06-03 Thread RMahoney
On Jun 1, 7:08 pm, Craig Weinberg whatsons...@gmail.com wrote: On Jun 1, 7:07 pm, RMahoney rmaho...@poteau.com wrote: On Jun 1, 1:31 pm, Craig Weinberg whatsons...@gmail.com wrote: On May 31, 6:14 pm, RMahoney rmaho...@poteau.com wrote: They seem to think this free will has some

Re: Free will in MWI

2012-06-01 Thread RMahoney
Does a Free Willer believe they willed themselves into existence in this Universe? Some can believe that. Open question in comp. Actually this universe is a quite vague concept with comp. Don't know comp. As far as I'm concerned, universe can be everything, all permutations. I don't

Re: Free will in MWI

2012-06-01 Thread RMahoney
On Jun 1, 12:27 pm, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote: On 6/1/2012 8:12 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote: They seem to think this free will has some ability to manipulate the Universe in ways that avoid it's laws. Not the compatibilist one. I think free will is not prevented at all by

Re: Free will in MWI

2012-06-01 Thread RMahoney
On Jun 1, 1:31 pm, Craig Weinberg whatsons...@gmail.com wrote: On May 31, 6:14 pm, RMahoney rmaho...@poteau.com wrote: They seem to think this free will has some ability to manipulate the Universe in ways that avoid it's laws. Free will is one of the laws of the universe. We are made

Re: Free will in MWI

2012-05-31 Thread RMahoney
Following the last couple of weeks of exchange between Craig and John Clark... Interesting. I would say John has the edge. And I have some comments... Does a Free Willer believe they willed themselves into existence in this Universe? They seem to think this free will has some ability to

Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?

2011-08-22 Thread RMahoney
No, we see the effect of photons on our receptors. Our dreams re-inact that effect. On Aug 12, 9:01 pm, Craig Weinberg whatsons...@gmail.com wrote: On Aug 12, 9:55 pm, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote: Photons don't carry charge.  If they did they'd interact with other photons and we

Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?

2011-08-11 Thread RMahoney
I've spent quite a bit of time thinking about this and seem to approach it from a different perspective than you have. Not much use in wondering why something exists rather than nothing, because obviously the latter is not the case. I came to the conclusion, if something exists, why doesn't

Re: Why is there something rather than nothing?

2011-08-11 Thread RMahoney
On Aug 11, 3:48 pm, Pilar Morales pilarmorales...@gmail.com wrote: ... To truly define non-existence, you would have to define a set of all that it is not: no time, no matter, no energy, no ideas, no mathematical constructs, and no each of the etcs to infinity. So out of nothing the universe

Re: Why I am I?

2010-01-28 Thread RMahoney
On Jan 8, 12:38 pm, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote: Welcome RMahoney, Nice thought experiments. But they need amnesia (like in going from   you to Cruise). I tend to think like you that it may be the case that   we are the same person (like those who result from a self- duplication

Re: R/ASSA query

2010-01-21 Thread RMahoney
this means there are any number of possible subsequent sets of quanta that follow from this very instant, when you look at any possible set of quanta in relation to another, thus the multiverse concept. It'll be that or something quite like it, my bet. :-) RMahoney -- You received this message because

Re: Why I am I?

2010-01-07 Thread RMahoney
pretty cool thread (read most but skimmed thru some of it though). I've spent the past 35 or so years (i'm now 56) pondering the subject of why I am I and doing thought experiment after thought experiment with cloning, copies, changing I one particle at a time until I am you or someone else, and

Re: Why I am I?

2010-01-07 Thread RMahoney
contains terrible things, including the very worst of possibilities, it also contains the very best as well. Having figured this much out to my satisfaction actually gives me a very contented, peaceful and secure feeling. RMahoney -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google