Re: Time and Freewill

2008-09-09 Thread Rich Winkel
On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 01:21:43PM -0500, Jason Resch wrote: One of the concerns people have with free will or the lack thereof is that if physics is deterministic, one's future actions can predicted beforehand, without them even having to exist. However, an interesting consequence of

Re: Can we ever know truth?

2006-08-18 Thread Rich Winkel
According to Brent Meeker: I don't think that's a good example of not considering the evidence. Ignorance is a relative term - he didn't know a child was about to run out in the street, but he (and most people) know there are children in residential areas and that they may run out in the

Re: Can we ever know truth?

2006-08-18 Thread Rich Winkel
According to Stathis Papaioannou: Why would you not include the well-known fact that driving at high speed is more likely to kill someone as evidence? If the driver honestly did not know this, say due to having an intellectual disability, then he would have dimminished responsibility for the

Re: Can we ever know truth?

2006-08-16 Thread Rich Winkel
According to Stathis Papaioannou: Given that even in case (c) doctors were completely wrong, the way we test new treatments now is more stringent. However, evidence is still evidence, including evidence of past failures from medical history, which must be included in any risk/benefit

Re: Can we ever know truth?

2006-08-16 Thread Rich Winkel
According to Rich Winkel: Medicine is not like astronomy. In that ignorance can be toxic. Rich --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Everything List group. To post to this group, send email

Re: Can we ever know truth?

2006-08-13 Thread Rich Winkel
According to Stathis Papaioannou: The best we can do in science as in everyday life is to accept provisionally that things are as they seem. There is no shame in this, as long as you are ready to revise your theory in the light of new evidence, and it is certainly better than assuming that things

Re: Re: Smullyan Shmullyan, give me a real example

2006-05-28 Thread Rich Winkel
According to Stathis Papaioannou: On the other hand, about 1/3 of people who present with psychotic symptoms will have either a complete or a near-complete response to medication with minimal side-effects, and it would be tragic if they missed out due to anti-psychiatry prejudice or (more

Re: Re: Smullyan Shmullyan, give me a real example

2006-05-28 Thread Rich Winkel
At the risk of wasting more bandwidth than I alread have I'd like to apologize for any discomfort I've caused on the list. Sometimes I feel like a jewish person arguing the reality of the holocaust to doubters. Such is the hidden record of psychiatry and the power of its PR machine. Please