Wei Dai:
I'm not sure what questionnaire Zen_Ved is referring to, but maybe it's this
paragraph from the mailing list invitation:
Because this mailing list attracts people from many different academic
fields, and many posts have high technical content, it is suggested that
after joining
Günther Greindl:
From the questionnaire:
Why do we believe that both the past and the future are not
completely random, but the future is more random than the past?
I didn't know we believed that *grin*.
Cheers,
G?nther
G?nther Greindl
Department of Philosophy of Science
As to Algebraic Physics; as well as to Wei Dai's ``everything''
questionnaire:
- possibly that it will be rather useful to read
http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0703043 , V5 (and the first couple of
pages in V1).
Note also briefly: the Universe (Universes ) is/are subsets of a very
specific set
Brian Tenneson:
Why is the universe a subset of the set information (which I assume is
defined in the article) and why can it not be formalized?
On Thu, Jul 3, 2008 at 1:38 AM, Zen_Ved [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As to Algebraic Physics; as well as to Wei Dai's ``everything
4 matches
Mail list logo
