Re: 3-PoV from 1 PoV?

2009-05-16 Thread Bruno Marchal
Hi Stephen, > > > Ok, Robinson Arithmatic is " ... or Q, is a finitely axiomatized > fragment of Peano arithmetic (PA). ...Q is essentially PA without > the axiom schema of induction. Even though Q is much weaker than PA, > it is still incomplete in the sense of Gödel." > http://en.wiki

Re: 3-PoV from 1 PoV?

2009-05-15 Thread Stephen Paul King
Hi Bruno, - Original Message - From: Bruno Marchal To: everything-list@googlegroups.com Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2009 10:35 AM Subject: Re: 3-PoV from 1 PoV? Hi Stephen, On 13 May 2009, at 22:20, Stephen Paul King wrote: snip By relagating

Re: 3-PoV from 1 PoV?

2009-05-14 Thread Bruno Marchal
Hi Stephen, On 13 May 2009, at 22:20, Stephen Paul King wrote: > Hi Bruno, > > I see the goal that you have, as best I can understand your > writtings and discussions. I salute your valiant efforts. The ideas > that I have expressed so far, such as those in this exchange, are > merely

Re: 3-PoV from 1 PoV?

2009-05-13 Thread Stephen Paul King
r its existence? Kindest regards, Stephen - Original Message - From: Bruno Marchal To: everything-list Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2009 11:11 AM Subject: Re: 3-PoV from 1 PoV? Hi Stephen, On 12 May 2009, at 19:53, Stephen Paul King wrote: Falsifiab

Re: 3-PoV from 1 PoV?

2009-05-13 Thread Bruno Marchal
Hi Stephen, On 12 May 2009, at 19:53, Stephen Paul King wrote: > > Falsifiable bets. ;) Not all. You bet the number zero makes sense, but you can hardly refute this. You bet there is a reality, but you can't falsify this. Falsifiability just accelerate the evolution of theories. Wor

Re: 3-PoV from 1 PoV?

2009-05-12 Thread Stephen Paul King
Hi Bruno, Interleaving some comments. - Original Message - From: Bruno Marchal To: everything-list@googlegroups.com ; Stephen Paul King Sent: Sunday, May 10, 2009 1:51 PM Subject: Re: 3-PoV from 1 PoV? On 08 May 2009, at 17:49, Stephen Paul King wrote: I

Re: 3-PoV from 1 PoV?

2009-05-10 Thread Bruno Marchal
On 08 May 2009, at 17:49, Stephen Paul King wrote: > I came upon the idea after considering how is it that the notion > of an "objective reality" when we know for a fact that all of our > knowledge does not come from any kind of direct contact with an > "objective reality", at best it

Re: 3-PoV from 1 PoV?

2009-05-08 Thread Stephen Paul King
Hi Bruno, I came upon the idea after considering how is it that the notion of an "objective reality" when we know for a fact that all of our knowledge does not come from any kind of direct contact with an "objective reality", at best it is infered. Leibniz' Monadology can be considered as a