On 17 Oct 2012, at 23:09, Stephen P. King wrote:
On 10/17/2012 1:29 PM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 17 Oct 2012, at 08:52, Stephen P. King wrote:
On 10/17/2012 2:07 AM, Russell Standish wrote:
>The self is directly related to the Dx = "xx" trick, for me.
The Dx=xx trick is about self-replicati
On 17 Oct 2012, at 23:57, Russell Standish wrote:
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 07:19:09PM +0200, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 17 Oct 2012, at 08:07, Russell Standish wrote:
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 03:39:18PM +0200, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 14 Oct 2012, at 23:27, Russell Standish wrote:
So any self-
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 07:19:09PM +0200, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
> On 17 Oct 2012, at 08:07, Russell Standish wrote:
>
> >On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 03:39:18PM +0200, Bruno Marchal wrote:
> >>
> >>On 14 Oct 2012, at 23:27, Russell Standish wrote:
> >>>So any self-organised system should be called al
On 10/17/2012 1:29 PM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 17 Oct 2012, at 08:52, Stephen P. King wrote:
On 10/17/2012 2:07 AM, Russell Standish wrote:
>The self is directly related to the Dx = "xx" trick, for me.
The Dx=xx trick is about self-replication. Of course entities with a
sense
of the self/ot
On 10/17/2012 1:19 PM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 17 Oct 2012, at 08:07, Russell Standish wrote:
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 03:39:18PM +0200, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 14 Oct 2012, at 23:27, Russell Standish wrote:
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 04:44:11PM -0400, Roger Clough wrote:
"Computational Autop
:51
Subject: Re: Computational Autopoetics 1
On 14 Oct 2012, at 22:44, Roger Clough wrote:
"Computational Autopoetics" is a term I just coined to denote
applying basic concepts
of autopoetics to the field of comp. You mathematicians are free to
do it more justice
than I can. I canno
On 17 Oct 2012, at 08:52, Stephen P. King wrote:
On 10/17/2012 2:07 AM, Russell Standish wrote:
>The self is directly related to the Dx = "xx" trick, for me.
The Dx=xx trick is about self-replication. Of course entities with
a sense
of the self/other distinction needn't replicate (eg certai
On 17 Oct 2012, at 08:07, Russell Standish wrote:
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 03:39:18PM +0200, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 14 Oct 2012, at 23:27, Russell Standish wrote:
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 04:44:11PM -0400, Roger Clough wrote:
"Computational Autopoetics" is a term I just coined to denote
app
eiving the following content -
From: Bruno Marchal
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2012-10-16, 09:34:51
Subject: Re: Computational Autopoetics 1
On 14 Oct 2012, at 22:44, Roger Clough wrote:
> "Computational Autopoetics" is a term I just coined to denote
> applying basic
On 10/17/2012 2:07 AM, Russell Standish wrote:
>The self is directly related to the Dx = "xx" trick, for me.
The Dx=xx trick is about self-replication. Of course entities with a sense
of the self/other distinction needn't replicate (eg certain robots).
Hi,
I have some papers and list post
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 03:39:18PM +0200, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
> On 14 Oct 2012, at 23:27, Russell Standish wrote:
>
> >On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 04:44:11PM -0400, Roger Clough wrote:
> >>"Computational Autopoetics" is a term I just coined to denote
> >>applying basic concepts
> >>of autopoetics
On Tue, Oct 16, 2012 at 07:58:35AM -0400, Roger Clough wrote:
> Hi Russell Standish
>
> 1) It is a cruelty of nature to make the two IMHO most powerful thinkers
> (Peirce and Leibniz) to be the two most difficult to understand.
> I would not throw them out just yet.
I'm not. But until someone c
On 14 Oct 2012, at 23:27, Russell Standish wrote:
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 04:44:11PM -0400, Roger Clough wrote:
"Computational Autopoetics" is a term I just coined to denote
applying basic concepts
of autopoetics to the field of comp. You mathematicians are free to
do it more justice
than I
On 14 Oct 2012, at 22:44, Roger Clough wrote:
"Computational Autopoetics" is a term I just coined to denote
applying basic concepts
of autopoetics to the field of comp. You mathematicians are free to
do it more justice
than I can. I cannot guarantee that the idea hasn't already been
exploi
g the following content -
From: Russell Standish
Receiver: everything-list
Time: 2012-10-15, 18:05:59
Subject: Re: Computational Secondness 1 (formerly Computational Autopoetics 1)
I'm more than happy for you to explore this, and report back when you
can explain it in terms other than
ontent -
> From: Russell Standish
> Receiver: everything-list
> Time: 2012-10-14, 17:27:50
> Subject: Re: Computational Autopoetics 1
>
> On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 04:44:11PM -0400, Roger Clough wrote:
> > "Computational Autopoetics" is a term I just coine
ceiver: everything-list
Time: 2012-10-14, 17:27:50
Subject: Re: Computational Autopoetics 1
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 04:44:11PM -0400, Roger Clough wrote:
> "Computational Autopoetics" is a term I just coined to denote applying basic
> concepts
> of autopoetics to the fi
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 04:44:11PM -0400, Roger Clough wrote:
> "Computational Autopoetics" is a term I just coined to denote applying basic
> concepts
> of autopoetics to the field of comp. You mathematicians are free to do it
> more justice
> than I can. I cannot guarantee that the idea hasn'
"Computational Autopoetics" is a term I just coined to denote applying basic
concepts
of autopoetics to the field of comp. You mathematicians are free to do it more
justice
than I can. I cannot guarantee that the idea hasn't already been exploited, but
I have
seen no indication of that.
Th
19 matches
Mail list logo
