Re: FW: [Mind and Brain] RE: Evolution from Scripture

2014-05-04 Thread LizR
Concern on isn't grammatical, I assume you mean concern with. Well, we were discussing creation myths vs science, hence the concern. It is grammatical in the same sense as Senators Express Concern onReverse Mortgage Rule *s* [*not rule*] By RACHEL

Re: FW: [Mind and Brain] RE: Evolution from Scripture

2014-05-04 Thread meekerdb
On 5/4/2014 1:45 AM, LizR wrote: Concern on isn't grammatical, I assume you mean concern with. Well, we were discussing creation myths vs science, hence the concern. It is grammatical in the same sense as Senators Express Concern on Reverse Mortgage Rule/s/ [/not rule/]

Re: FW: [Mind and Brain] RE: Evolution from Scripture

2014-05-04 Thread LizR
On 5 May 2014 07:56, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote: On 5/4/2014 1:45 AM, LizR wrote: Concern on isn't grammatical, I assume you mean concern with. Well, we were discussing creation myths vs science, hence the concern. It is grammatical in the same sense as Senators Express

Re: FW: [Mind and Brain] RE: Evolution from Scripture

2014-05-04 Thread meekerdb
On 5/4/2014 3:00 PM, LizR wrote: On 5 May 2014 07:56, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net mailto:meeke...@verizon.net wrote: On 5/4/2014 1:45 AM, LizR wrote: Concern on isn't grammatical, I assume you mean concern with. Well, we were discussing creation myths vs science, hence

Re: FW: [Mind and Brain] RE: Evolution from Scripture

2014-05-04 Thread LizR
On 5 May 2014 13:18, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote: On 5/4/2014 3:00 PM, LizR wrote: On 5 May 2014 07:56, meekerdb meeke...@verizon.net wrote: On 5/4/2014 1:45 AM, LizR wrote: Concern on isn't grammatical, I assume you mean concern with. Well, we were discussing creation