Brent,
Thank you for your answer. I have thought more and I believe that now I
understand the paper better.
I would agree that an ideal potential barrier, provided it is created
intelligently, does not inject the energy in a micro- and a macrosystem.
Well, if a potential barrier has some
Brent,
I have nothing against of fundamental science and I do not expect
practical application for this paper.
Yet, I do not see fundamental results. What is in the paper is just a
change of vocabulary. I would say that we are free to choose a
definition. Well, right now when free will is
On 14.03.2012 19:58 meekerdb said the following:
On 3/14/2012 11:51 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
...
Then the thermodynamic entropy is subjective. Try to convince in this
engineers who develop engines, or chemists who compute equilibria, and
see what happens.
It is relative not just to the
On 15.03.2012 22:58 Russell Standish said the following:
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 07:25:01PM +0100, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
On 14.03.2012 23:34 Russell Standish said the following:
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 07:51:13PM +0100, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
Then the thermodynamic entropy is subjective. Try
On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 03:49:17PM +0200, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
Do you mean that the Laplace deamon would not agree with the Second Law?
Evgenii
Yes - there is no second law for the Laplace daemon. Each microstate
is distinct and equiprobable.
Cheers
--
On 3/25/2012 6:44 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
On 14.03.2012 19:58 meekerdb said the following:
On 3/14/2012 11:51 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
...
Then the thermodynamic entropy is subjective. Try to convince in this
engineers who develop engines, or chemists who compute equilibria, and
see what
On 14.03.2012 23:34 Russell Standish said the following:
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 07:51:13PM +0100, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
Then the thermodynamic entropy is subjective. Try to convince in
this engineers who develop engines, or chemists who compute
equilibria, and see what happens.
I take
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 07:25:01PM +0100, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
On 14.03.2012 23:34 Russell Standish said the following:
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 07:51:13PM +0100, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
Then the thermodynamic entropy is subjective. Try to convince in
this engineers who develop engines, or
On 13 Mar 2012, at 18:20, meekerdb wrote:
On 3/13/2012 6:48 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 13 Mar 2012, at 01:43, Russell Standish wrote:
http://www.nature.com/news/the-unavoidable-cost-of-computation-revealed-1.10186
This about experimentally testing Landauer's principle that
computation
On 3/14/2012 11:51 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
On 13.03.2012 20:59 meekerdb said the following:
On 3/13/2012 12:44 PM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
On 13.03.2012 20:32 meekerdb said the following:
On 3/13/2012 12:26 PM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
...
In my collection I have this quote for example
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 07:51:13PM +0100, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
Then the thermodynamic entropy is subjective. Try to convince in
this engineers who develop engines, or chemists who compute
equilibria, and see what happens.
I take Denbigh Denbigh's position that entropy is not subjective,
http://www.nature.com/news/the-unavoidable-cost-of-computation-revealed-1.10186
This about experimentally testing Landauer's principle that
computation has thermodynamic constraints.
--
Prof Russell Standish
On 13 Mar 2012, at 01:43, Russell Standish wrote:
http://www.nature.com/news/the-unavoidable-cost-of-computation-revealed-1.10186
This about experimentally testing Landauer's principle that
computation has thermodynamic constraints.
I was worrying a bit with that title, thinking Landauer's
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
It looks like computation would need energy, but the energy is needed
only for erasing information, and since a paper by Hao Wang (universal, and
thus all) computations can be done without ever erasing information.
Yes, with a
Russell,
Thanks for the link. Yet, it is unclear to me what is exactly
information and computation in this experiment. To be more precise, let
us take physicalism:
http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/physicalism/
This is probably in what I believe right now, although as I have
described
On 3/12/2012 5:43 PM, Russell Standish wrote:
http://www.nature.com/news/the-unavoidable-cost-of-computation-revealed-1.10186
This about experimentally testing Landauer's principle that
computation has thermodynamic constraints.
This energy consumption is getting ever lower, and Lutz says
On 3/13/2012 6:48 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 13 Mar 2012, at 01:43, Russell Standish wrote:
http://www.nature.com/news/the-unavoidable-cost-of-computation-revealed-1.10186
This about experimentally testing Landauer's principle that
computation has thermodynamic constraints.
I was
On 13.03.2012 18:20 meekerdb said the following:
On 3/13/2012 6:48 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 13 Mar 2012, at 01:43, Russell Standish wrote:
http://www.nature.com/news/the-unavoidable-cost-of-computation-revealed-1.10186
This about experimentally testing Landauer's principle that
On 3/13/2012 10:28 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
On 13.03.2012 18:20 meekerdb said the following:
On 3/13/2012 6:48 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 13 Mar 2012, at 01:43, Russell Standish wrote:
http://www.nature.com/news/the-unavoidable-cost-of-computation-revealed-1.10186
This about
On 3/13/2012 12:26 PM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
On 13.03.2012 20:09 meekerdb said the following:
On 3/13/2012 10:28 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
...
Could you please give one example from physics (yet please not a
thought experiment) where information allows us to reduce entropy?
On 3/13/2012 9:48 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 13 Mar 2012, at 01:43, Russell Standish wrote:
http://www.nature.com/news/the-unavoidable-cost-of-computation-revealed-1.10186
This about experimentally testing Landauer's principle that
computation has thermodynamic constraints.
I was
On 13.03.2012 20:32 meekerdb said the following:
On 3/13/2012 12:26 PM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
On 13.03.2012 20:09 meekerdb said the following:
On 3/13/2012 10:28 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
...
Could you please give one example from physics (yet please not a
thought experiment) where
On 3/13/2012 12:44 PM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
On 13.03.2012 20:32 meekerdb said the following:
On 3/13/2012 12:26 PM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
On 13.03.2012 20:09 meekerdb said the following:
On 3/13/2012 10:28 AM, Evgenii Rudnyi wrote:
...
Could you please give one example from physics (yet
23 matches
Mail list logo
