Great discussion. Thanks for posting it. Much of it above my head. But I
take solace in the observation that it's above the head of the participants
as well! AG
On Sunday, February 11, 2018 at 3:30:04 PM UTC-7, Bruce wrote:
>
> Scott Aaronson has an interesting blog entry on quantum
> On 11 Feb 2018, at 23:29, Bruce Kellett wrote:
>
> Scott Aaronson has an interesting blog entry on quantum interpretations:
>
> https://www.scottaaronson.com/blog/?p=3628
>
> He seems somewhat conflicted over which interpretation to believe.
> "Anyway, as I
No interpretation is really physics. These are more in a way metaphysics.
They are not consistent with each other and yet they are commensurate with
quantum mechanics. This means they are auxiliary. They generally can be
lumped into two categories, those that are ψ-epistemic and those that are
On Mon, 12 Feb 2018 at 9:30 am, Bruce Kellett
wrote:
> Scott Aaronson has an interesting blog entry on quantum interpretations:
>
> https://www.scottaaronson.com/blog/?p=3628
>
> He seems somewhat conflicted over which interpretation to believe.
> "Anyway, as I
Scott Aaronson has an interesting blog entry on quantum interpretations:
https://www.scottaaronson.com/blog/?p=3628
He seems somewhat conflicted over which interpretation to believe.
"Anyway, as I said, MWI is the best interpretation if we leave ourselves
out of the picture. what would
5 matches
Mail list logo