Re: Interpretive cards (MWI, Bohm, Copenhagen: collect ’em all)

2018-02-18 Thread agrayson2000
Great discussion. Thanks for posting it. Much of it above my head. But I take solace in the observation that it's above the head of the participants as well! AG On Sunday, February 11, 2018 at 3:30:04 PM UTC-7, Bruce wrote: > > Scott Aaronson has an interesting blog entry on quantum

Re: Interpretive cards (MWI, Bohm, Copenhagen: collect ’em all)

2018-02-12 Thread Bruno Marchal
> On 11 Feb 2018, at 23:29, Bruce Kellett wrote: > > Scott Aaronson has an interesting blog entry on quantum interpretations: > > https://www.scottaaronson.com/blog/?p=3628 > > He seems somewhat conflicted over which interpretation to believe. > "Anyway, as I

Re: Interpretive cards (MWI, Bohm, Copenhagen: collect ’em all)

2018-02-12 Thread Lawrence Crowell
No interpretation is really physics. These are more in a way metaphysics. They are not consistent with each other and yet they are commensurate with quantum mechanics. This means they are auxiliary. They generally can be lumped into two categories, those that are ψ-epistemic and those that are

Re: Interpretive cards (MWI, Bohm, Copenhagen: collect ’em all)

2018-02-11 Thread Stathis Papaioannou
On Mon, 12 Feb 2018 at 9:30 am, Bruce Kellett wrote: > Scott Aaronson has an interesting blog entry on quantum interpretations: > > https://www.scottaaronson.com/blog/?p=3628 > > He seems somewhat conflicted over which interpretation to believe. > "Anyway, as I

Interpretive cards (MWI, Bohm, Copenhagen: collect ’em all)

2018-02-11 Thread Bruce Kellett
Scott Aaronson has an interesting blog entry on quantum interpretations: https://www.scottaaronson.com/blog/?p=3628 He seems somewhat conflicted over which interpretation to believe. "Anyway, as I said, MWI is the best interpretation if we leave ourselves out of the picture. what would