> On 1 Jun 2020, at 18:46, Lawrence Crowell
> wrote:
>
> On Sunday, May 31, 2020 at 2:37:22 AM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>> On 30 May 2020, at 19:24, Lawrence Crowell > > wrote:
>>
>> I wrote a paper recently for publication on how the unital set of QM is a
>> Cantor/fractal set that is
On Sunday, May 31, 2020 at 2:37:22 AM UTC-5, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>
> On 30 May 2020, at 19:24, Lawrence Crowell > wrote:
>
> I wrote a paper recently for publication on how the unital set of QM is a
> Cantor/fractal set that is fundamentally incomputable.
>
>
> I use the Cantor (triadic)
> On 30 May 2020, at 21:51, ronaldheld wrote:
>
> Is the AI discovering some Physics or just fitting data which produces
> equations that look like physical laws?
The question is if the equation obtained makes the good predictions, on any, or
at least “many” different data.
It is easy to
> On 30 May 2020, at 19:24, Lawrence Crowell
> wrote:
>
> I wrote a paper recently for publication on how the unital set of QM is a
> Cantor/fractal set that is fundamentally incomputable.
I use the Cantor (triadic) set, or the Baire space. But it is more the measure
on the possible local
You could ask the same question about physicists.
Brent
On 5/30/2020 12:51 PM, ronaldheld wrote:
Is the AI discovering some Physics or just fitting data which produces
equations that look like physical laws?
Ronald
On Thursday, May 28, 2020 at 12:20:49 PM UTC-4, Philip Thrift wrote:
Is the AI discovering some Physics or just fitting data which produces
equations that look like physical laws?
Ronald
On Thursday, May 28, 2020 at 12:20:49 PM UTC-4, Philip Thrift wrote:
>
>
> https://www.facebook.com/461616050561921/posts/3107668729289960/
>
>
> We just posted a new AI
I wrote a paper recently for publication on how the unital set of QM is a
Cantor/fractal set that is fundamentally incomputable. This is a measure of
nonlinearity a quantum system is forced into, say with gravitation or with
einselection into classicality. To compute it requires a single
> On 28 May 2020, at 18:20, Philip Thrift wrote:
>
>
>
>
> https://www.facebook.com/461616050561921/posts/3107668729289960/
>
>
> We just posted a new AI paper on how to automatically discover laws of
> physics from raw video with machine learning. For example, we feed in the
> video
Of course nature's "theory" could be beyond a human's comprehension.
It is assumed that there all that's needed can be reduced to human
(mathematical) language that can be expressed in a few lines of LaTeX Math.
@philipthrift
On Friday, May 29, 2020 at 7:45:58 PM UTC-5, Lawrence Crowell
On Thursday, May 28, 2020 at 11:20:49 AM UTC-5, Philip Thrift wrote:
>
>
> https://www.facebook.com/461616050561921/posts/3107668729289960/
>
>
> We just posted a new AI paper on how to automatically discover laws of
> physics from raw video with machine learning. For example, we feed in the
>
https://www.facebook.com/461616050561921/posts/3107668729289960/
We just posted a new AI paper on how to automatically discover laws of physics
from raw video with machine learning. For example, we feed in the video below
of a rocket moving in a circles in a magnetic field, seen through a
11 matches
Mail list logo
